Soifer v. Mount Sinai Hospital

Decision Date22 May 1978
CitationSoifer v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 405 N.Y.S.2d 116, 63 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
PartiesBruka SOIFER et al., Respondents, v. The MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Bower & Gardner, New York City(Thomas R. Newman and Steven DiJoseph, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Krause & Krause, New York City(Leslie Elliot Krause, New York City, of counsel), for respondents.

Before MARTUSCELLO, J. P., and SUOZZI, RABIN and HAWKINS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a medical malpractice action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 30, 1977, which (1) granted plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery"of any and all incident reports pertaining to the occurrence alleged in the complaint in the treatment and care rendered to the plaintiff, Bruka Soifer" and (2) denied defendant's cross motion for a protective order on the ground that defendant had not timely moved for such an order within the five-day period.

Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion denied and cross motion granted.

Defendant's failure to move for a protective order within five days after service of the notice for discovery and inspection, as provided for in CPLR 3122, is not an absolute bar to the granting of a motion for a protective order(Whittington v. Rectors, Wardens & Vestry of Church of Advent...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Pataki v. Kiseda
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 13, 1981
    ...in preparation for litigation (see Braun v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 67 A.D.2d 898, 413 N.Y.S.2d 181; Soifer v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 63 A.D.2d 713, 405 N.Y.S.2d 116; O'Neill v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 27 A.D.2d 185, 277 N.Y.S.2d 771). As noted by this court in ......
  • Carlo v. Queens Transit Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 2, 1980
    ...prepared for litigation only (see, Braun v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 67 A.D.2d 898, 413 N.Y.S.2d 181; Soifer v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 63 A.D.2d 713, 405 N.Y.S.2d 116; Reese v. Long Is. R. R. Co., 24 A.D.2d 581, 262 N.Y.S.2d 194; Kandel v. Tocher, 22 A.D.2d 513, 256 N.Y.S.2d 898). Th......
  • Stein v. Trump Village Section No. 4, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 22, 1983
    ...however, they warranted immunity (see Braun v. Great Atlantic & Tea Co., 67 A.D.2d 898, 413 N.Y.S.2d 181; Soifer v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 63 A.D.2d 713, 405 N.Y.S.2d 116; O'Neill v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 27 A.D.2d 185, 277 N.Y.S.2d In 1980, subdivision (g), under the h......
  • Chaplin v. Pathmark Supermarkets
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 22, 1980
    ...prepared for litigation only (see, Braun v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 67 A.D.2d 898, 413 N.Y.S.2d 181; Soifer v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 63 A.D.2d 713, 405 N.Y.S.2d 116; Reese v. Long Is. R. R. Co., 24 A.D.2d 581, 262 N.Y.S.2d 194; Kandel v. Tocher, 22 A.D.2d 513, 256 N.Y.S.2d 898). Th......
  • Get Started for Free