Solak v. Twitter, Inc.
Decision Date | 12 October 2022 |
Docket Number | 2022-0491-KSJM |
Parties | Solak v. Twitter, Inc. |
Court | Court of Chancery of Delaware |
Blake A. Bennett, Esquire Cooch and Taylor, P.A.
Raymond J. DiCamillo, Esquire Kevin M. Gallagher, Esquire Matthew D. Perri, Esquire Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick Chancellor
Dear Counsel:
Plaintiff John Solak ("Plaintiff") filed the above-referenced action to compel Defendant Twitter, Inc. ("Defendant") to provide its books and records for inspection under to 8 Del. C. § 220. Plaintiff filed his Complaint and Motion to Expedite on June 7, 2022.[1]Plaintiff and Defendant then entered into a series of stipulations extending Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint.[2] The most recent of these stipulations, which I granted on August 11, provides that Defendant "shall not be required to respond to the Complaint until a date to be mutually agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the Court."[3]
The parties failed to agree to a date to respond to the Complaint or a schedule for litigating this action. In a status letter submitted to the court on September 28, 2022, however, Plaintiff states that Defendant has failed to respond to Plaintiff's scheduling proposals.[4] Plaintiff requests that I issue an order requiring Defendant to respond to the Complaint and Motion to Expedite.[5]
Plaintiff's request is granted. Defendant is hereby ordered to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Motion to Expedite no later than 5 p.m., October 26, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
---------
[1] C. A. No. 2022-0491-KSJM, Docket ("Dkt.") 1.
[2] Dkt. 7, 9, 11.
[3] Dkt. 11.
[4] Dkt. 12.
[5] Id.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial