Solomon by Solomon v. City of New York

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation499 N.Y.S.2d 392,66 N.Y.2d 1026,489 N.E.2d 1294
Parties, 489 N.E.2d 1294 Carolyn SOLOMON, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, Arthur SOLOMON, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
Decision Date26 December 1985
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, 111 A.D.2d 802, 490 N.Y.S.2d 547, should be affirmed, with costs.

To establish a prima facie case of negligence, a plaintiff must demonstrate (1) a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, (2) a breach thereof, and (3) injury proximately resulting therefrom (Akins v. Glens Falls City School Dist., 53 N.Y.2d 325, 333, 441 N.Y.S.2d 644, 424 N.E.2d 531, citing Prosser, Torts § 30, at 143 [4th ed.] ). In its proprietory capacity, "a municipality is under a duty to maintain its park and playground facilities in a reasonably safe condition" (Nicholson v. Board of Educ., 36 N.Y.2d 798, 799, 369 N.Y.S.2d 703, 330 N.E.2d 651). This duty "includes not only physical care of the property but also prevention of ultrahazardous and criminal activity of which it has knowledge" (Benjamin v. City of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 44, 46, 484 N.Y.S.2d 525, 473 N.E.2d 753). Bicycle riding on a busy promenade does not rise to the level of "ultrahazardous and criminal" (see, Zarillo v. State of New York, 8 A.D.2d 651, 185 N.Y.S.2d 101, affd. 7 N.Y.2d 943, 198 N.Y.S.2d 314; cf. Benjamin v. City of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 44, 484 N.Y.S.2d 525, 473 N.E.2d 753, supra; Caldwell v. Village of Is. Park, 304 N.Y. 268, 107 N.E.2d 441; Nicholson v. Board of Educ., 36 N.Y.2d 798, 369 N.Y.S.2d 703, 330 N.E.2d 651, supra ). Thus, as a matter of law, the city did not breach its duty to plaintiffs.

Nor has plaintiff stated a cause of action based on the city's alleged failure to enforce the regulations prohibiting bicycle riding in the area where the infant plaintiff was injured. By promulgating and enforcing these regulations, intended for the protection of the general public, defendant did not assume a special relationship toward the infant plaintiff carrying with it a special duty to protect the latter from the prohibited activity (Sorichetti v. City of New York, 65 N.Y.2d 461, 468, 492 N.Y.S.2d 591, 482 N.E.2d 70; De Long v. County of Erie, 60 N.Y.2d 296, 304, 469 N.Y.S.2d 611, 457 N.E.2d 717; Florence v. Goldberg, 44 N.Y.2d 189, 195-196, 404...

To continue reading

Request your trial
425 cases
  • Doona v. Onesource Holdings Inc
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • January 7, 2010
    ......No. 06-CV-00894 (DLI)(VVP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. Decided: Jan. 7, 2010. [680 F.Supp.2d 395]         COPYRIGHT ... Curley v. AMR. Corp., 153 F.3d 5, 13 (2d Cir.1998); Solomon v. City of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 1026, . 499 N.Y.S.2d 392, 489 N.E.2d ......
  • Stagl v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 423
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • April 17, 1995
    ...that duty; and (3) the plaintiff suffered damage as a proximate result of that breach. See Solomon v. City of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 1026, 1027, 499 N.Y.S.2d 392, 392, 489 N.E.2d 1294, 1294 (1985). This appeal raises questions that touch upon all three elements, and we shall address each one i......
  • Royal Ins. Co. of America v. Ru-Val Elec. Corp., CV-92-4911.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • March 12, 1996
    ...duties absent an action establishing a special relationship to the individual harmed. See Solomon v. City of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 1026, 1028, 499 N.Y.S.2d 392, 393, 489 N.E.2d 1294, 1295 (1985); Florence v. Goldberg, 44 N.Y.2d at 194, 404 N.Y.S.2d at 586-88, 375 N.E.2d at Safety code enforce......
  • Spinrad v. Comair, Inc., 09–CV–4111.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • November 23, 2011
    ...Di Benedetto v. Pan Am. World Serv., Inc., 359 F.3d 627, 630 (2d Cir.2004) (citing Solomon ex rel. Solomon v. City of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 1026, 499 N.Y.S.2d 392, 489 N.E.2d 1294, 1294 (1985)). The state applies “the traditional, basic negligence standard of reasonable care under the circums......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT