Solomon v. Boschulte, 10830.

Decision Date03 December 1952
Docket NumberNo. 10830.,10830.
Citation200 F.2d 482
PartiesSOLOMON v. BOSCHULTE.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

John Lawrence Phillips, Jr., Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, V. I., for appellant.

Alphonso A. Christian, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, V. I., for appellee.

Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the Virgin Islands entered for the defendant in a civil action of equitable character intended to impress a fund with a trust in favor of the plaintiff. After full hearing the court found that plaintiff had proved neither the establishment and existence of the claimed fund nor any obligation upon which a constructive trust could properly be founded.

The record reveals certain facts rather clearly. The plaintiff, Solomon, is an elderly man who, for many years, tended an old family burial ground which was a small parcel of estate Anna's Fancy in St. Thomas, Virgin Islands. From 1927 to 1947 he performed this service at the request of the defendant, Boschulte, who was administering the property. The service was not intended to be gratuitous but just what the agreement of the parties was concerning compensation and what obligation, if any, has remained outstanding are in controversy. In any event, plaintiff's services were terminated in 1947 and neither at that time nor thereafter until 1952 did he make any demand upon defendant. He now contends that Boschulte owes him about $1,000 and that as a result of certain recent transactions funds in the hand of Boschulte are impressed with a constructive trust in his favor. Whether this theory of liability was adopted in anticipation of the invocation of the statute of limitations against a simple debt claim, or for some other reason, does not appear.

The recent events said to give rise to a constructive trust grew out of the return of one of the absentee owners of the Anna's Fancy property to St. Thomas. This was the first time in many years that any owner of the property had been in the Virgin Islands. The owner called upon defendant for a full accounting covering a long period of years. In rendering such an accounting, defendant claimed as a credit an item in excess of $1,000 for the maintenance of the family burial ground, including work actually done by plaintiff. But on the whole accounting there seems to have been no question but that the defendant was indebted to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Grandy v. Luther
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 1975
    ...is neither a trust fund, nor, for that matter, a trustee to whom the fund has been turned over for administration. Solomon v. Boschulte, 200 F.2d 482 (3d Cir. 1952); Hackner v. Morgan, 130 F.2d 300 (2d Cir. 1942); Edisto National Bank v. Bryant, 72 F.2d 917 (4th Cir. 1934); In re United Cig......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT