Solomon v. Resolution Tr. Corp.

Decision Date03 October 1994
Docket Number93-1748.,93-1757.
Citation513 U.S. 801,115 S.Ct. 43,115 S.Ct. 44,130 L.Ed.2d 5
PartiesSOLOMON ET AL. v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR NASSAU SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN., F. A.; and PATTULLO ET AL. v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR NASSAU SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN., F. A.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of O'Melveny & Myers v. FDIC, 512 U. S. 79 (1994).

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • July 29, 2010
    ...(explaining Martin Act's detailed process for submitting offering plans for Attorney General approval), vacated, 513 U.S. 801, 115 S.Ct. 43, 44, 130 L.Ed.2d 5 (1994). At first, federal courts allowed private litigants to bring causes of action directly under the Enforcement Section. See Lup......
  • Mbia Ins. Corp. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • March 8, 2013
    ...only of the FDIC's authority to repudiate. See RTC v. Diamond, 18 F.3d 111, 122 (2d Cir.1994), vacated on other grounds,513 U.S. 801, 115 S.Ct. 43, 130 L.Ed.2d 5. The FDIC suggests, moreover, that the Bankruptcy Code does not have the need to “strengthen [the FDIC's] hand in remedying a nat......
  • Nat'l Credit Union Admin. Bd. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • January 28, 2014
    ...at 675; see also RTC v. Diamond, 18 F.3d 111, 113 (2d Cir. 1994) ("Diamond I"), granted, vacated, and remanded by Solomon v. Resolution Trust Corp., 513 U.S. 801 (1994), for reconsideration in light of O'Melveny & Myers v. FDIC, 512 U.S. 79 (1994), reinstated in relevant part by Diamond II,......
  • In re Dabrowski, 99-B-44654 (REG).
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • January 4, 2001
    ...(describing the two programs' operation from a federal law perspective), vacated and remanded sub nom. Solomon v. Resolution Trust Corp., 513 U.S. 801, 115 S.Ct. 43, 130 L.Ed.2d 5 (1994), on remand, 45 F.3d 665 (2d Cir. 1995) ("Diamond II"). The maximum rent for each rent-controlled propert......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Double Jeopardy-civil Forfeitures and Criminal Punishment: Who Determines What Punishments Fit the Crime
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 19-02, December 1995
    • Invalid date
    ...forfeiture is the same offense, although the issue was not analyzed. 86. 870 P.2d 413 (1993), cert. granted and judgment vacated, 115 S. Ct. 44 87. Id. at 413-14. 88. In Dixon, the Court reaffirmed the Blockburger rule for determining whether two distinct statutory provisions constitute the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT