Soprano v. American Hardware Mut. Ins., Co., 83-56-A
| Citation | 491 A.2d 1008 |
| Decision Date | 30 April 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-56-A,83-56-A |
| Parties | Joseph SOPRANO v. AMERICAN HARDWARE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. ppeal. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Rhode Island |
The defendant, American Hardware Mutual Insurance Company (the Company), appeals from an order of the Superior Court denying and dismissing its motion to vacate an arbitrator's award and granting the motion of the appellee, Joseph Soprano (Soprano), to confirm that award. The primary issue on appeal is whether the plaintiff waived his right to seek arbitration. We hold that the plaintiff did waive his arbitration rights, and therefore reverse the Superior Court and vacate the arbitration award.
This matter arose as a result of an automobile accident between plaintiff's vehicle and an uninsured motorist's vehicle on April 9, 1977. On January 11, 1980, Soprano filed a complaint in the Superior Court seeking damages from the company under the uninsured-motorist provision of his insurance contract for injuries allegedly sustained in the accident. The company answered the complaint and filed a third-party complaint against the uninsured motorist, Vartan Bajakian. Discovery by the parties commenced in February 1980.
On June 23, 1981, some eighteen months into the prosecution of his civil action, plaintiff made a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association (AAA), pursuant to the terms of the insurance contract. The plaintiff's arbitration demand sought compensation for the same injuries that were the subject matter of his pending lawsuit against the company. The plaintiff's attorney did not forward a copy of the letter demanding arbitration to defendant's attorney of record in Rhode Island, but claims to have sent a copy to defendant directly. An arbitrator was selected without the participation of defendant's attorney, although such participation would have been proper under the AAA's procedures. The defendant claims that the sole reason for its nonparticipation in the selection process was plaintiff's failure to serve notice on its attorney. An arbitration hearing was scheduled for October 1981; notice of this hearing, in September 1981, was the first word that defendant's attorney received concerning arbitration.
Beginning on September 25, 1981, hearings were commenced in the Superior Court to determine whether the arbitration proceedings or the lawsuit should continue. A Superior Court order was entered denying the company's motion to stay the arbitration proceedings. On February 18, 1982, this court denied the company's petition for a writ of certiorari to quash that order. 1
Hearings before the appointed arbitrator were conducted in May and June 1982, and final memoranda were submitted to the arbitrator in September 1982. The arbitrator filed his decision with the AAA on November 1, 1982. The award granted Soprano $50,000 as damages, plus prejudgment interest. 2
On November 10, 1982, Soprano filed a petition to confirm the arbitrator's award in the Superior Court pursuant to G.L.1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 10-3-11. This petition was not submitted as part of his initial civil action against the company. The company timely filed its objection to the petition, moved to vacate the award, and moved to consolidate Soprano's petition with his earlier lawsuit. On November 24, 1982, the motion to consolidate the actions was granted by the Superior Court, and on December 30, 1982, the Superior Court entered judgment confirming the arbitrator's award. The company filed its appeal to this court on January 18, 1983.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether Soprano waived his right to proceed to arbitration by initiating and pursuing a civil action against the company. The Rhode Island Arbitration Act, § 10-3-3, provides for a stay of a civil action pending arbitration as follows:
"If any suit or proceeding be brought upon any issue referable to arbitration under an agreement in writing for such arbitration, the court in which such suit is pending * * * shall, on application of one of the parties, stay the trial of the action until such arbitration has been had * * * providing the applicant for the stay is not in default in proceeding with such arbitration."
This court noted, in ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fairview Cemetery Ass'n of Stillwater v. Eckberg
...482 F.Supp. 991, 998 (S.D.Tex.1980); Gabor v. Spicyn, 99 A.D.2d 1000, 473 N.Y.S.2d 457 (1984); Soprano v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co., 491 A.2d 1008, 1011 (R.I.1985). We have adopted the same general rule in Minnesota concerning waiver of an arbitration agreement when a party pro......
-
James P. Tavares Construction, Inc. v. State Contractors' Registration Board
...be inconsistent with the obvious intent of the statute, which is to expedite resolution of claims between contractors and the public. See id. For these reasons, this Court concludes that, pursuant to CRLB Reg. § 4.6(1)(c), the CRLB properly processed the claim because the contractor did not......
-
James P. Tavares Constr., Inc. v. R.I. Contractors' Registration Bd.
...had already been commenced, waste judicial resources, and inconvenience the opposing party. See generally Soprano v. Am. Hardware Mut. Ins. Co., 491 A.2d 1008, 1010 (R.I. 1985) (stating that the plaintiff did not request arbitration with reasonable diligence and that initiating arbitration ......
-
Stanley-Bostitch, Inc. v. Regenerative Environmental Equipment Co., Inc.
... ... the rules and procedures * * * of the American Arbitration Association." The subsequent ... Co., 540 A.2d 21, 22 (R.I.1988); Soprano v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co., 491 ... ...