Sorey v. State

Decision Date26 September 1985
Citation476 So.2d 675
PartiesSorey (James Albert) v. State NO. 66,903
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Appeal From: 3d DCA

463 So.2d 1225

Pet. for rev. den.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • KS v. State, 5D01-1520.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 19 Abril 2002
    ......State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla. 1982); Williams v. State, 740 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Formor v. State, 676 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); C.E. v. State, 665 So.2d 1097 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Miles v. State, 466 So.2d 239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), pet. for review denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985); Sorey v. State, 419 So.2d 810 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Knight v. State, 294 So.2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 303 So.2d 29 (Fla.1974). Further, where the print is found on an item or in a place accessible to the general public, and no other evidence establishes that the print was made at the time of the ......
  • Johnson v. State, 86-1889
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 10 Noviembre 1987
    ...... See Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210, 212 (Fla.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920, 105 S.Ct. 303, 83 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984); Avery v. State, 505 So.2d 596, 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); L.S. v. State, 446 So.2d 1148, 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), aff'd, 464 So.2d 1195 (Fla.1985); Sorey v. State, 419 So.2d 810, 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985).         Second, the trial court properly denied the defendant's motion for mistrial based on the prosecutor's comment during closing argument that the defendant's sister didn't know where the defendant ......
  • Copeland v. State, 84-2401
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 28 Octubre 1986
    ......Gen., and Nancy C. Wear, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.         Before NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.         PER CURIAM.         We reject the defendant's claims that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction, see Sorey v. State, 419 So.2d 810 (Fla.3d DCA 1982), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985), and that the trial court's reasons for upwardly departing from the presumptive guideline sentence were not clear and convincing, see Hankey v. State, 485 So.2d 827 (Fla.1986); Moore v. State, 468 So.2d 1081 (Fla.3d ......
  • Avery v. State, BI-446
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 10 Abril 1987
    ...... The defendant's version, however, need not be accepted if it is contradicted by other proof showing the version to be false. Sorey v. State, 419 So.2d 810 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1982), petition for rev. denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985). Here, the state presented adequate circumstantial evidence which, when coupled with the appellant's fingerprints found on the cash drawer, was sufficient to allow the trial court judge to send the case ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT