South Carolina Produce Ass'n v. COM'R OF INT. REVENUE
Decision Date | 17 June 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 3143.,3143. |
Citation | 50 F.2d 742 |
Parties | SOUTH CAROLINA PRODUCE ASS'N v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Allen G. Gartner, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Wm. Cutler Thompson, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Louis Monarch, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Nathan Gammon, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before PARKER, NORTHCOTT, and SOPER, Circuit Judges.
This is a petition to review a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals, involving deficiencies in income taxes for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1923, and September 30, 1924, in the amounts of $165.50 and $456.30, respectively. 19 B. T. A. 1028.
Petitioner is a corporation organized under the general corporation statutes of South Carolina, with its principal office at Meggett, S. C., and since its organization in 1915 has been engaged in marketing perishable produce and purchasing supplies for its members. It has authorized capital stock of $20,000, divided into 1,000 shares, voting common stock of $10 par value, and 1,000 shares non-voting common stock of $10 par value. The petitioner charged all its members a commission of 5 per cent. on sales made for them, which was its only source of income, except interest on its bank deposits during the years under review, and paid annual dividends to its stockholders of 10 per cent. upon its capital stock for all years dating from its organization from 1915 to 1924, inclusive. Subsequent to 1924 it decreased its annual dividends to 7 per cent. The legal rate in South Carolina was, and is, 7 per cent., except when by written agreement it could be made 8 per cent. In addition to the dividends paid, the petitioner had in the years 1923 and 1924 a surplus of $89,583.03 and $93,381.18, respectively, and, in addition, had a reserve for bad debts of $1,500 in each year, and a reserve for depreciation of $12,576 and $16,229.10, respectively.
The only issue is whether petitioner is exempt from taxation for its fiscal years ended September 30, 1923, and 1924, under the provisions of sections 231 (11) of the Revenue Acts of 1921 (42 Stat. 253) and 1924 (26 USCA § 982 note), which are identical, and which are as follows:
All of the provisions of article 522 of the Commissioner's Regulations 62, pertaining to the 1921 act, are contained in article 522 of his Regulations 65 of the 1924 Act, which provides:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Craig v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans
... ... 86, 10 So. 574; ... Gulfport Bldg. & Loan Assn. v. Gulfport, 155 Miss ... 498, 124 So. 658; ... Leuch, 144 N.W. 290, 156 ... Wis. 121; South Carolina Produce Assn. v. Com'r of ... Internal Revenue, (C. C. A.), 50 F.2d 742; Flannagan ... v ... ...
-
Farmers Cooperative Co. v. Birmingham
...also accumulated large surplus and reserve accounts was denied an exempt status because of such actions in South Carolina Produce Ass'n v. Commissioner, 4 Cir., 1931, 50 F.2d 742. Transacting more than the prescribed volume of business with nonmembers may also cause the cooperative to lose ......
-
Union Equity Coop. Exch. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...then only to an extent that would not jeopardize its exemption. See, e.g., secs. 521(b)(2) and 1382(c)(1); South Carolina Produce Ass'n v. Commissioner, 50 F.2d 742 (C.A. 4, 1931), affirming 19 B.T.A. 1028(1930); Farmers Mutual Cooperative Creamery, 33 B.T.A. 117(1935); Laura Farmers Cooper......
-
St. Louis Rose Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Com'n
... ... 917; Christgau ... v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn., 293 N.W. 619; ... Unemployment Compensation ... South Carolina Produce Assn. v. Commissioner of l ... Revenue, 50 F.2d 742. (2) Employees of respondent are ... ...
-
Coming to terms with strict and liberal construction.
...(1985). (198) Id. at 491-92 n.10 (quoting Callanan v. United States, 364 U.S. 587, 596 (1961)). (199) S.C. Produce Ass'n v. Commissioner, 50 F.2d 742, 744 (4th Cir. (200) See Hurley, 58 P. at 815 (stating that, to give plain meaning, one must strictly construe the language); Sedima, 473 U.S......