South Carolina v. King
| Docket Number | 27826 |
| Decision Date | 18 July 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
26 cases
-
State v. Ostrowski
...Non-criminal bad acts that fall under one of the exceptions must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. See State v. King , 424 S.C. 188, 200, 818 S.E.2d 204, 210 (2018) (citing State v. Fletcher , 379 S.C. 17, 23, 664 S.E.2d 480, 483 (2008) ). "Further, even though the evidence is cle......
-
State v. Hopkins
...827, 830 (2001). The burden is "on the opponent of the evidence to establish inadmissibility" under Rule 403. State v. King , 424 S.C. 188, 200 n.6, 818 S.E.2d 204, 210 n.6 (2018). "A trial [court's] decision regarding the comparative probative value and prejudicial effect of evidence shoul......
-
State v. Sledge
...whether the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice." State v. King , 424 S.C. 188, 200 n.6, 818 S.E.2d 204, 210 n.6 (2018). The misstated test "incorrectly places the burden on the proponent of the evidence to establish admissibility, w......
-
State v. Sanders
... ... circuit court in a sufficiently specific manner that brings ... attention to the exact error. If a party fails to properly ... object, the party is procedurally barred from raising the ... issue on appeal.") (internal citations omitted); ... c.f. State v. King, 424 S.C. 188, 200, 818 S.E.2d ... 204, 210 (2018) (finding an objection citing a rule of ... evidence preserved the issue for review because the ... defendant's argument was sufficiently specific and ... apparent from the context of the objection). Moreover, the ... ...
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Rule 403. Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time
...the opposite: whether the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice." State v. King, 424 S.C. 188, 200 n.6, 818 S.E.2d 204, 210 n.6 (2018). The misstated test "incorrectly places the burden on the proponent of the evidence to establish adm......
-
Rule 404. Character Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Conduct; Exception; Other Crimes
...If the defendant was not convicted of the prior crime, evidence of the prior bad act must be clear and convincing." State v. King, 424 S.C. 188, 200, 818 S.E.2d 204, 210 (2018), reh'g denied (Sept. 21, 2018). "If the [circuit court] concludes there is clear and convincing evidence that the ......
-
Rule 404. Character Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Conduct; Exception; Other Crimes
...If the defendant was not convicted of the prior crime, evidence of the prior bad act must be clear and convincing." State v. King, 424 S.C. 188, 200, 818 S.E.2d 204, 210 (2018), reh'g denied (Sept. 21, 2018). "If the [circuit court] concludes there is clear and convincing evidence that the ......
-
Rule 403. Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time
...the opposite: whether the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice." State v. King, 424 S.C. 188, 200 n.6, 818 S.E.2d 204, 210 n.6 (2018). The misstated test "incorrectly places the burden on the proponent of the evidence to establish adm......
Get Started for Free