South Covington Cincinnati Street Railway Company v. City of Covington
Decision Date | 05 January 1915 |
Docket Number | No. 28,28 |
Citation | 59 L.Ed. 350,35 S.Ct. 158,235 U.S. 537 |
Parties | SOUTH COVINGTON & CINCINNATI STREET RAILWAY COMPANY, Plff. in Err., v. CITY OF COVINGTON, John J. Craig, Mayor, and Henry B. Schuler, Chief of Police |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Alfred C. Cassatt, Frank W. Cottle, and Richard P. Ernst for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 538 intentionally omitted] Mr. Frederick W. Schmitz for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 539-541 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:
This case originated in a petition filed by the South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Company, a corporation of the state of Kentucky, having for its purpose to enjoin the city of Covington from enforcing a certain ordinance regulating the operation of the street cars of the company. The features of the ordinance essential to be considered here are found in its first seven sections, which are:
The circuit court of Kenton county, Kentucky, refused the injunction and dismissed the petition, and this decree was affirmed by the court of appeals of Kentucky (146 Ky. 592, 143 S. W. 28), and the case is brought here.
It was set up in the petition and amended petition that the ordinance is an unlawful interference with interstate commerce, in violation of the Federal Constitution, article I., § 8, giving exclusive authority to Congress over that subject; that it deprives plaintiff of its property without due process of law, in violation of the 14th Amendment; and that it impairs the obligation of a certain contract previously entered into between the plaintiff and the city of Covington, in violation of article I., § 10, of the Constitution.
The testimony shows that the plaintiff is a Kentucky corporation, and its principal occupation is the carrying of passengers in connection with an Ohio corporation which operates on the other side of the Ohio river, upon continuous and connecting tracks, and across a bridge from Covington to Cincinnati, which this court has held to be an instrument of interstate commerce . This traffic is conducted by means of continuous trips and for a single fare, between points on the lines of the railway in Covington and Fourth street or Fountain square in the city of Cincinnati or from any point between Fourth street or Fountain square in the city of Cincinnati to points in the city of Covington. Practically every car is thus engaged in going to or coming from Cincinnati, and from 75 to 80 per cent of the passengers carried in the city of Covington are being transported from Covington to Cincinnati, or from Cincinnati to Covington, or farther in Kentucky. The cars operate without change...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Landon v. Public Utilities Commission of State of Kansas
... ... John H ... Atwood, of Kansas City, Mo., Robert Stone, of Topeka, Kan., ... Chester ... the Kansas Natural Gas Company against the Public Utilities ... Commission of ... Railway Company, 185 F. 321, 107 C.C.A. 403; ... L.Ed. 1410; Louisville Trust Co. v. Cincinnati, 76 ... F. 296, 22 C.C.A. 334; Williamson v ... 229, 57 L.Ed. 442; ... So. Covington Ry. v. Covington, 235 U.S. 537, 35 ... Sup.Ct ... In the ... case of South Covington Ry. Co. v. Covington, 235 ... U.S ... and regulating street cars running between that city and ... ...
-
Southern Pac Co v. State of Arizona Sullivan
... ... against appellant, the Southern Pacific Company, to recover the statutory penalties for operating ... 715, 725, 56 L.Ed. 1182; Carey v. State of South Dakota, 250 U.S. 118, 122, 39 S.Ct. 403, 404, 63 ... 865, 868, 35 L.Ed. 572; Brennan v. City of Titusville, 153 U.S. 289, 302, 14 S.Ct. 829, 32, 38 L.Ed. 719; Covington, etc., Bridge Co. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, ... of an efficient and economical national railway system. On many railroads passenger trains of ... ...
-
Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Northern Oklahoma Rys.
... ... Berry King, both of Oklahoma City", Okl., on the brief), for appellees ... \xC2" ... , mail and express over said line of railway and to receive compensation therefor." The ... Louis-San Francisco Railway Company at a small station, Nemo, about three miles from ... be located wholly within one state or of street, suburban, or interurban electric railways, which ... north and northeast, and some of it will go south down in Houston, Fort Worth and Dallas, possibly ... Ct. 592, 58 L. Ed. 988; South Covington & Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. v. Covington, 235 U ... ...
-
Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Williamson
... ... Anderson, both of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Rainey, Flynn, Green & Anderson, Cruce, ... suit by Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company against Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of ... DeCuir, 95 U.S. 485, 24 L.Ed. 547; Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Kentucky, 154 U.S ... Rate Cases, supra; Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Kaw Valley Drainage District, 233 U.S. 75, 34 S.Ct. 564, 58 L.Ed. 857; South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. City ... ...
-
How Many Times Was Lochner-era Substantive Due Process Effective? - Michael J. Phillips
...(order that tracks of competing railroads be connected at various points); South Covington & Cincinnati St. Ry. v. City of Covington, 235 U.S. 537, 548-49 (1915) (regulation that temperature of railroad cars never should fall below fifty degrees); Great N. Ry. v. Minnesota, 238 U.S. 340, 34......
-
Federal Taxation - Ben E. Muraskin, James A. Lawton, and Tiffani W. Greene
...occupation" to explain section 464(f)(3)(B))). 41. Id. 42. Id. (citing South Covington & Cincinnati St. Ry. v. City of Covington, 235 U.S. 537, 544 (1915) (referring to the "principal occupation" of a corporation)). 43. Id. 44. Id. 45. Id. at 899-900 (citing S. REP. No. 99-313, at 268 (1986......