South Florida Wellness, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Docket Number14-10001
Decision Date14 February 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
135 cases
  • Blaszczyk v. Darby
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • November 26, 2019
    ...v. S. Holland Dodge , Nos. 10-13290, 10-13908, 2015 WL 4429456, at *4 (E.D. Mich. July 20, 2015) (citing S. Fla. Wellness, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co. 745 F.3d 1312, 1316 (11th Cir. 2014) ); Goldsmith v. Sutherland , 426 F.2d 1395, 1398 (6th Cir. 1970)."To defeat diversity jurisdiction, ‘it m......
  • Cernelle v. Graminex
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • February 4, 2020
    ...must be ‘sufficiently measurable and certain’ to satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement." South Fla. Wellness, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co. , 745 F.3d 1312, 1316 (11th Cir. 2014) (citation omitted); see also Chrysler Grp. LLC v. South Holland Dodge, Inc. , No. 10-12984, 2015 WL 4429456,......
  • Goff v. Caliber Home Loans
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • October 21, 2020
    ...all, "[e]stimating the amount in controversy is not nuclear science." Scott, 865 F.3d at 196 (quoting S. Fla. Wellness, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 745 F.3d 1312, 1317 (11th Cir. 2014)). As noted in the Complaint, the MCPA permits the recovery of reasonable attorney's fees. C.L. § 13-408; se......
  • Cisney v. Johnson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • July 25, 2018
    ...Cir. 2003) (quoting Cohen v. Office Depot, Inc., 204 F.3d 1069, 1077 (11th Cir. 2000)); see also South Florida Wellness, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 745 F.3d 1312, 1315-16 (11th Cir. 2014) ("We have held that for amount in controversy purposes, the value of injunctive or declaratory relief i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Class Actions
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 66-4, June 2015
    • Invalid date
    ...Id.59. Id. at 1291-92. 60. See Dudley v. Eli Lilly & Co., 778 F.3d 909 (11th Cir. 2014); S. Fla. Wellness, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 745 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2014).61. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2) (2012).62. 745 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2014).63. Id. at 1313. The opinion for the court was authored b......
  • Trial Practice and Procedure
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 66-4, June 2015
    • Invalid date
    ...action in circumstances like those presented here, even if the proffer comes before the plaintiff has moved to certify a class.").103. 745 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2014).104. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2) (2012).105. S. Fla. Wellness, 745 F.3d at 1313.106. Id. After Florencio Sanchez was treated by We......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT