South Louisiana Elec. Co-op. Ass'n v. Louisiana Public Service Commission

Decision Date24 February 1975
Docket NumberNo. 55473,55473
Citation309 So.2d 287
PartiesSOUTH LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court

Stanwood R. Duval, Jr., James M. Funderburk, Duval, Arceneaux & Lewis, Houma, for plaintiff-appellant.

Marshall B. Brinkley, Gen. Counsel, La. Public Service Com'n, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.

Andrew P. Carter, Eugene G. Taggart, Monroe & Lemann, New Orleans, for intervenor-appelleeLa. Power & Light Co.

MARCUS, Justice.

Louisiana Power & Light Company(LP ) filed a complaint with the Louisiana Public Service Commission claiming that in 1973 South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Association(SLECA) constructed an electric distribution line to serve Crescent Place Subdivision, Terrebonne Parish, in violation of La.R.S. 45:123, as amended byActNo. 34 of 1970, there being an existing line of LP constructed in 1940 located less than 300 feet from the Crescent Place Subdivision.SLECA denied that the 'point of connection' was within 300 feet of the LP line.After hearing, the Commission ordered SLECA to dismantle the plant constructed to serve the subdivision within sixty days of the order and further ordered that LP purchase the underground cable facilities already installed by SLECA in the Crescent Place Subdivision.SLECA appealed to the Nineteenth Judicial District Court Parish of East Baton Rouge, and, after affirmance by that court of the Commission's order, lodged an appeal in this court.

The sole issue in this territorial dispute is the interpretation to be given 'point of connection' as used in La.R.S. 45:123, as amended bySection 2 of ActNo. 34 of 1970.This statute provides as follows:

No electric public utility shall construct or extend its facilities, or furnish, or offer to furnish electric service to any point of connection which at the time of the proposed construction, extension, or service is being served by, or which is not being served but is located within 300 feet of an electric line of another electric public utility, exception with the consent in writing of such other electric public utility; provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall preclude (a) any electric public utility from extending service to an applicant for service at an unserved point of connection located within 300 feet of an existing electric line of such electric public utility, unless (i) such line was not in operation on April 1, 1970 and (ii) the point of connection is located within 300 feet of an existing electric line, of another electric public utility, which line was in operation on said date, or (b) any electric public utility from extending service to its own property, or to another electric public utility for resale; and provided further that any consumer who feels aggrieved with the electric service being received by him may apply to the Louisiana Public Service Commission for an order directed to his present supplier to show cause why the consumer should not be released from said supplier, and if the commission shall find that the service rendered to such consumer is inadequate and will not be rendered adequate within a reasonable time the release shall be granted.

As used in this section, an 'electric line' is a line constructed and operated for the transmission and/or distribution of electricity and which was not originally constructed for the principal purpose of preempting territory.

The provisions of this section shall not apply to municipally-owned or operated utilities of the State of Louisiana or to the parish of Orleans.Nothing in R.S. 45:121, 45:123, 45:1161, 45:1175 or R.S. 12:426 shall alter the rights or authority of municipalities with respect to franchises.

At the hearing before the Commission, it was established that in 1940 LP constructed an electric distribution line along Louisiana State Highway 311 which is still in service.This existing line is located at one point 291.4 feet from the property line of Crescent Place Subdivision.Only a small portion of one lot of the subdivision is located within 300 feet of the electric line on Highway 311.There is no evidence of a meter connection within this area.The lot is designated as park area on the plat of the subdivision.On or about July 16, 1973, SLECA commenced construction of an electric distribution line approximately two miles from Hollywood Road to Crescent Place Subdivision.The cost of this line was $28,032.87.Additionally, SLECA constructed underground facilities inside the subdivision at a cost of $21,914.77.The latter figure included the cost of ten street light standards of approximately $2,500.00.1The construction of these facilities is claimed by LP to be an invasion of its service area and in violation of La.R.S. 45:123.

SLECA contends here, as it did before the Commission and district court, that the evidence adduced shows that there is no 'point of connection' within 300 feet of the existing LP line on Highway 311.It is admitted that a portion of one lot of Crescent Place Subdivision is located within 300 feet of this line, but it is SLECA's interpretation of this phrase that there must be actual connection to a house meter.It construes 'point of connection' to mean the point where the service hooks up to the individual house meter.

On the other hand, LP contends that 'point of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 10 Abril 1978
    ...Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n, 322 So.2d 133 (La.1975); South Louisiana Electric Co-operative Ass'n v. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n, 309 So.2d 287 (La.1975). See also: Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n, 343 So.2d 1040 (La.1977......
  • Citgo Petroleum v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 15 Marzo 2002
    ...ultimate arbiter of the meaning of these statutes. See Washington St. Tammany, 671 So.2d at 912; South Louisiana Elec. Coop. Assoc. v. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 309 So.2d 287 (La.1975). Giving no deference to these interpretations, we now determine the correct interpretation of the statu......
  • Washington-St. Tammany Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Com'n
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 8 Abril 1996
    ...to point of connection and not to an area as interpreted by the supreme court in South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Association v. Louisiana Public Service Commission[, 309 So.2d 287 (La.1975) ]. If a new point of connection arises within 300 feet of two utility company service lines, I f......
  • Central Louisiana Elec. Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 9 Abril 1979
    ...meter connection and not the subdivision as a whole nor the lots within the subdivision. South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Assn. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission, 309 So.2d 287 (La.1975). Instead, Central Louisiana Electric argued that the Cooperative violated the Commission's Gene......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT