South v. City of Wyandotte

• Decision Date: 01 April 1884
• Citation: 3 P. 527,31 Kan. 721
• Parties: THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH SOUTH, OF WYANDOTTE CITY, KANSAS, v. THE CITY OF WYANDOTTE
• Court: Kansas Supreme Court

3 P. 527

31 Kan. 721

THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH SOUTH, OF WYANDOTTE CITY, KANSAS, v. THE CITY OF WYANDOTTE

Supreme Court of Kansas

April 1, 1884

Error from Wyandotte District Court.

ACTION by The Methodist Episcopal Church South, of Wyandotte City Kansas, against The City of Wyandotte. On May 23, 1883, the plaintiff filed the following petition (omitting court and title):

"The plaintiff states that it is a religious corporation existing, organized and incorporated under the laws of the state of Kansas, and known by the corporate name of the Methodist Episcopal Church South, of Wyandotte City, Kansas and complains and alleges that the defendant, the city of Wyandotte, is a municipal corporation, created, existing and incorporated under the laws of the state of Kansas, and known by the corporate name of the city of Wyandotte; and that said city of Wyandotte is a city of the second class, duly incorporated as aforesaid.

"Plaintiff further states that it is the owner and in possession of the following real estate lying and being situate in the city of Wyandotte, county of Wyandotte, and state of Kansas, and described as follows, to wit: Beginning at the northwest corner of the graveyard survey, known as the burial ground in the allotment of the Wyandotte commissioners appointed under the treaty of Washington, approved January 31, 1855, between the United States and the Wyandotte nation of Indians; thence west, 9 links and 67 poles; thence south, 10 poles; thence east, 6 poles and 33 links; thence north, 10 degrees 30 minutes east, along the western boundary of said graveyard survey, 10 poles and 55 links, to place of beginning containing one-half acre of land, and lying on the south side of Minnesota avenue, a public street of said city of Wyandotte, and adjoining to and abutting said street; that on the real estate above described there is erected a large and commodious brick building, the property of and in possession of plaintiff, known as a church building, and used as a place of public worship by the plaintiff and the public, and there is also erected on said real estate a frame building containing four rooms, also the property of and in the possession of plaintiff, being a convenient dwelling house and used as a parsonage or place of residence of the officiating minister; that the said buildings and other improvements on said real estate were erected some years since at a cost of about four thousand dollars, and that the value of said real estate and said improvements thereon is the sum of eight thousand dollars; that before the erection of the said buildings and improvements as aforesaid, to wit on or about the day of , 1872, a grade was purported and pretended to be established on Minnesota avenue, a public street as aforesaid, and that said buildings and improvements were made and erected by plaintiff with a view and in conformity thereto; that in the month of January, 1883, said defendant did proceed unlawfully and without authority to grade and lower said street opposite to and adjoining and abutting plaintiff's said property, and to change said pretended established grade of said street as aforesaid by unlawfully and without authority digging and carrying away the dirt from said street, and lowering the same about nine feet by removing and taking away the dirt from said street adjoining and abutting plaintiff's said property as aforesaid; that by reason of the lowering and taking away of the dirt from said street as aforesaid, so done as aforesaid unlawfully and without legal authority, the said real estate and buildings of plaintiff as aforesaid are greatly damaged and the safety thereof greatly endangered, the foundation of said buildings being likely to give away on account of the digging and taking the dirt of said street as aforesaid; and the said buildings are hereby rendered less accessible; and further, that the value of the said property is greatly depreciated and lessened, and that said property has been rendered less desirable in every way in consequence of the aforesaid illegal, unlawful and unauthorized acts of the said defendant as aforesaid.

"Plaintiff further states that defendant well knew of the damage done to plaintiff by the lowering of the said street as aforesaid, and that no lawful means were taken by defendant as provided by law to ascertain and assess the amount of the damages so done as aforesaid, before or at the time of the lowering the street as aforesaid, by having the amount of damages or injury done to plaintiff as aforesaid ascertained and assessed by competent persons, citizens of said city selected and qualified as is by law in such cases made and provided, and to do the same defendant wholly failed, neglected, and refused.

"Plaintiff further states that on the 6th day of March, 1883, at the city of Wyandotte, in said county and state, plaintiff presented a certain claim or demand in writing to the council of the said city of Wyandotte, defendant aforesaid, against the said defendant in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, being the amount of damages sustained by plaintiff by reason as aforesaid, together with a full account of the items thereof, and verified by the oath of the agent of plaintiff as required by law; and that an allowance of the same or any part thereof by the council of the city of Wyandotte (defendant aforesaid) was then and there refused, and said claim rejected.

"Plaintiff states that by the unlawful and unauthorized acts of the defendant, so done as aforesaid, plaintiff is injured and damaged in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, and which sum defendant having refused to pay, or any part thereof, by reason aforesaid an action hath obtained in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, being the damage sustained by plaintiff as aforesaid. Plaintiff therefore prays judgment against defendant for the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, and for costs of suit."

On June 11, 1883, the defendant demurred to the petition, upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor...