Southeastern Fire Ins. Co. v. Shubert

Decision Date10 December 1968
Docket Number7 Div. 904
Citation217 So.2d 251,44 Ala.App. 587
PartiesSOUTHEASTERN FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. Edna SHUBERT.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Beck & Beck, Fort Payne, for appellant.

L. Clyde Traylor, Fort Payne, for appellee.

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

This is an action by Mrs. Edna Shubert against Southeastern Fire Insurance Company to recover damages allegedly due for the loss of her automobile under a policy of insurance issued by appellant insuring the car against loss by fire or theft.

The complaint is in two counts. Count one alleges destruction of the car by fire. Count A alleges theft of the automobile.

Trial by a jury resulted in a verdict for plaintiff, with damages assessed at $950.00. Defendant appeals.

Appellant sets up as a defense to the action based on the policy in question that plaintiff was not entitled to recover because prior to its loss or destruction the plaintiff had transferred the title of the automobile to her grandson, Harold Welter, or that the automobile belonged to the American Discount Company.

The evidence shows that plaintiff purchased a 1963 Ford Galaxie automobile from John Thomas Motors, of Gadsden. The bill of sale given the plaintiff, Mrs. Edna B. Shubert, on the date of sale, August 30, 1963 shows the total price as $2939.40. Allowance of $1339.40 was given as a trade-in on a 1960 Pontiac. The balance of the purchase price, after adding sales tax, etc., of $1627.75, was financed by the American Discount Company of Georgia, under a conditional sale contract, with monthly payments of $62.97.

The defendant below, Southeastern Fire Insurance Company, issued a policy of insurance indemnifying the plaintiff as purcaser or borrower and American Discount Company, "as their interests may appear," for the loss of the automobile by fire or theft. The limit of liability for loss under the policy was the "actual cash value of the property."

Under the terms of the policy the "named individual" is defined as the purchaser or borrower. The policy defines the "Insured" as the "Named Individual" or any person using or having custody with the insured's permission.

The plaintiff introduced in evidence a bill of sale for the car from John Thomas Motors, a conditional sale contract held by American Discount Company and the policy of insurance, all of said exhibits showing the plaintiff as the owner of the automobile.

Mrs. Shubert testified she had never at any time given, sold or transferred the automobile to anyone. Her grandson, who lived in a garage apartment in back of her house, was allowed to use the car and did use it all the time, but that the car was only loaned to him.

Mr. W.F. Campbell, Credit Manager for the finance company, called as a witness for defendant, testified the records of his company listed Mrs. Shubert as the owner of the automobile and that her grandson, Harold Welter, would be the principal driver. This witness stated that the finance company and the insurance company were owned by the same corporation; that their offices were in the same building and they had complete access to each other's files; that the finance company was agent for the insurance company.

Plaintiff's evidence tends to show that in May of 1964, the automobile was taken from plaintiff's driveway without her knowledge or permission and that it was later found stripped and burned. Mrs. Shubert had made ten monthly payments and continued making payments to the finance company for about two months after the car was burned and then stopped making payments.

According to Mr. Campbell's evidence, the balance due the finance company after repossessing the salvage was $1549.72, reduced by premium rebates to $1415.77, which amount was paid in full by the defendant insurance company. The salvage was sold for $87.50.

Mrs. Shubert testified the cash value of the automobile before its loss was $2500.00 and after it burned its fair market value was about $100.00. Mr. Chris Johnson testified he purcased the salvage for $127.50.

As a witness for defendant, James A. Davis, a state investigator testified that during the course of the investigation of the burning of the automobile he talked with Mrs. Shubert and her grandson; that the grandson said Mrs. Shubert purchased the automobile for him in her name because he was under age; that he was the owner of the car and was making the payments on it. He testified on cross examination that Harold Welter was later indicted for arson for the burning of the car.

Mr. G.H. Noles, Chief Criminal Investigator for DeKalb County, testified the automobile had been stripped and burned The first assignment of error is predicated on the following incident:

that Harold Welter, plaintiff's grandson, was indicted for and plead guilty to a charge of arson.

By plaintiff's counsel: "Now, Mrs. Shubert, just before the automobile was burned or stolen and burned--now, that was your automobile wasn't it?"

Defense counsel objected to the question because "leading and suggestive." The court overruled the objection. Plaintiff's counsel stated:

"She has already answered it. Now, you have owned several automobiles in your lifetime, haven't you?"

Argument in brief is that "these leading questions had been very relevant and consistent on the part of counsel for plaintiff;" and, "This was an abuse of the discretion of the court and permitting the continuation of this form of questioning by the counsel for the plaintiff."

No other such incident is cited, and the witness did not answer the question. There is no reversible error in this ruling of the trial court.

Assignments of error 2 and 3 relate to the court's action in overruling objections to the introduction in evidence of plaintiff's exhibits 4 and 5, which are as follows:

"a

d

c

AMERICAN DISCOUNT COMPANY

201 South First Street

P.O. Box 520 Liberty 6-6325

Gadsden, Alabama 35902

October 5, 1964

Mrs. Edna A. Shubert

Route 3

Henegar, Alabama

Acct. No 116-001-27920-10

Dear Mrs. Shubert:

Since we have had no response to our previous correnspondence regarding payment on your account with our office, it is assumed that you have no intention of continuing regular monthly payments on this account. Also, in view of the fact that the account is past due for the August and September 10 installments, we are, by this letter, declaring the outstanding indebtedness of $1,637.22 due and payable in full.

Unless funds are received to pay this account in full within five days from receipt of this letter, we shall declare the automobile a repossession and proceed to liquidate our outstanding balance without further notice.

Yours very truly,

AMERICAN DISCOUNT COMPANY

Ned Bender, Manager"

Plaintiff's Exhibit 5:

"a

d

c

AMERICAN DISCOUNT COMPANY

225 Broad Street

P.O. Box 510 Liberty 6-6325

Gadsden, Alabama

July 22, 1964

Mrs. Edna Shubert

Route 3

Henegar, Alabama

Re: Account Number 116-001-27920-10

Dear Mrs. Shubert:

Our records indicate that the physical damage insurance on your 1963 Ford which you have financed with our company will expire August 30, 1964. Please advise on or before the above mentioned date whether or not you wish this policy extended for an additional 12 months, or if you plan to furnish our office with a policy through another company.

"If we have not heard from you by August 30, 1964, it will be necessary that we renew this policy for an additional 12 months and bill you for the amount of the premium.

This can be handled very simply if you will contact our office either in person or by phone prior to August 30, 1964. If you would like, we can revise your account to include the renewal premium in your payments.

Yours very truly,

AMERICAN DISCOUNT COMPANY

Credit Manager

THE MOST TRUSTED NAME IN...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT