Southerland v. State, 8 Div. 128
Decision Date | 23 April 1985 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 128 |
Citation | 471 So.2d 522 |
Parties | Roger SOUTHERLAND and Kathy Thornton v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
W.D. Wilkes, Jr., Guntersville, David Cromwell Johnson, Birmingham, James D. Walker, Albertville, for appellants.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Robert B. Rinehart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Appellant Roger Southerland was sentenced to five years' imprisonment for attempt to commit rape in the first degree, in violation of § 13A-6-61, Code of Alabama 1975. Appellant Kathy Thornton was found guilty of attempt to commit sodomy in the first degree, in violation of § 13A-6-63, Code of Alabama 1975, and sentenced to four years' imprisonment. There is one issue on their combined appeals.
Appellants contend that the state did not present sufficient evidence to support a verdict of guilty on the charges of attempted rape and attempted sodomy.
On February 4, 1983, the victim, Stacy Hornback, went with appellants Kathy Thornton (now Southerland) and Roger Southerland to Huntsville, where the three visited a number of nightclubs. While at these clubs, all three had numerous drinks. During this time, Miss Hornback stated that Southerland kissed her and rubbed her legs.
After leaving the last nightclub they visited, Mr. Southerland began driving down a road that Miss Hornback was not familiar with. She stated that she became alarmed when she realized that Mr. Southerland was not taking her home. Southerland told her that he did not want to drive through Guntersville, and that is why he was going that way.
Mr. Southerland proceeded to drive to his house on Buck Island just outside Guntersville. All three of them went inside. Miss Hornback tried to use the phone to call someone to come and get her, only to learn that the phone was dead.
At this time appellant Kathy Thornton went back to the bedroom and Southerland began pushing, but not forcing, Miss Hornback into the bedroom. When Miss Hornback got to the bedroom, Kathy Thornton had disrobed and was lying stretched out on the bed. Miss Hornback testified that she was made to engage in various sexual acts with them, including intercourse with Southerland, and oral sex with Thornton, over a period of about one and one-half hours.
Miss Hornback did not forcibly try to resist. However, she stated that when she appeared reluctant to perform certain sexual acts "Roger would hit me with his hand or a belt" on her buttocks. Miss Hornback stated that she was hit at least a dozen times by Southerland and Thornton during this hour and one-half period. No verbal threats were made, however. Eventually, Miss Hornback, who suffered from a breathing difficulty, screamed at them that she could not breathe and they let her go into the den.
Later, appellants Southerland and Thornton had something to eat, lay down on the sofa and went to sleep. Stacy Hornback then got up and ran out the front door. She proceeded to run down the road and stopped after about three hundred yards to dress. Miss Hornback then ran to a house and telephoned her roommate, Debbie Snow, to come and get her. Debbie and her friend, Russ Messer, came for her and took her to Russ's home, where he called the police. The police arrived and took Miss Hornback's statement, after which she went to a hospital for examination.
Section 13A-1-9, states as follows regarding lesser included offenses:
"(a) A defendant may be convicted of an offense included in an offense charged. An offense is an included one if:
....
(2) It consists of an attempt or solicitation to commit the offense charged or to commit a lesser included offense;
....
(b) The court shall not charge the jury with respect to an included offense unless there is a rational basis for a verdict convicting the defendant of the included offense. (Acts 1977, No. 607, p. 812, § 126)." (Emphasis added).
This court has noted:
"A charge on a lesser included offense should not be given where there is no reasonable theory from the evidence to support such a proposition."
Hollins v. State, 415 So.2d 1249 (Ala.Cr.App.1982).
The court in Hollins further stated that if the evidence clearly showed the defendant was either guilty or innocent of the offense charged, then a charge on a lesser included offense should not be given.
Section 13A-4-2, Code of Alabama 1975, states that "A person is guilty of the offense of an attempt to commit a crime if, with the intent to commit a specific offense, he does any overt act toward the commission of such offense." No mention is made in this code section of the element of failure to consummate the crime. The commentary to § 13A-4-2 of the code, however, states:
Section 13A-4-5, Code of Alabama 1975, at first seems to be in conflict with this rule. Section 13A-4-5 states in part:
"(a) It is no defense to a prosecution for criminal solicitation, section 13A-4-1, attempt, section 13A-4-2, or criminal conspiracy, section 13A-4-3, that the offense solicited, attempted or conspired was actually committed."
However, our case law is clear that failure to consummate the offense is still an element of an attempt. This interpretation was strengthened by Ard v. State, 358 So.2d 792 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 358 So.2d 794 (Ala.1978), which was written after the passage of the new criminal code but interpreted § 13-9-3 of the old code. Section 13A-4-5, addresses an original prosecution for an attempt, and so does not apply in this case.
The court in Alldredge v. State, 453 So.2d 1332 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), in a somewhat similar fact situation, stated at page 1335:
In Myers, we said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Erin S. T.
...arguing that it is error to give an attempt instruction where the only evidence demonstrates a completed crime, see Southerland v. State, 471 So.2d 522 (Ala. Crim. App. 1985); State v. Van, 543 S.W.2d 827 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976), or no crime at all. See Brock v. State, 954 So.2d 87 (Fla. Dist. ......
-
Harper v. State
...tended to encourage a "compromise verdict," and the law does not approve or contemplate a compromise verdict. Southerland v. State, 471 So.2d 522, 524 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). "Statements of law in judicial opinions, especially when taken out of context, are not always proper for jury instruction......
-
Johnson v. State
...455 So.2d 265, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). Moreover, we find that the error, even if preserved, was harmless. In Southerland v. State, 471 So.2d 522, 524-25 (Ala.Cr.App.1985), this Court held that a jury may not compromise and convict a defendant of a lesser included offense not supported by the......