Southern Pacific Company v. Walton, No. 548
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 296 U.S. 647,80 L.Ed. 461,56 S.Ct. 308 |
| Docket Number | No. 548 |
| Parties | SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, a corporation, petitioner, v. Leila Mae WALTON, Administratrix, etc. * |
| Decision Date | 09 December 1935 |
v.
Leila Mae WALTON, Administratrix, etc.*
Mr. Arthur B. Dunne, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
For opinion below, see 48 P.(2d) 108.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeals, State of California, denied.
* Rehearing denied 296 U. S. 665, 56 S. Ct. 380, 80 L. Ed. 474.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 practice notes
-
Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Smith, No. 37831.
...including particularly: State ex rel. Cities Service Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm., 337 Mo. 809, 85 S.W. (2d) 890, certiorari denied 80 L. Ed. 461; State ex rel. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service Comm., 93 S.W. (2d) 675. (2) The exemption from the Sales Tax Act specificall......
-
Barnes v. Whelan, Nos. 81-1535
...the time of filing. See, e.g., Watters v. Hamilton Gas Co., 10 F.Supp. 323, 326 (S.D.W.Va.), aff'd, 79 F.2d 428 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 647, 56 S.Ct. 307, 80 L.Ed. 460 (1935). 20 We cannot say Congress intended to change the meaning of "principal assets" when it included that phr......
-
Watters v. Hamilton Gas Co., No. 2889.
...438. In both of these decisions, certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States was sought and refused, Hamilton Gas. Co. v. Harper, 296 U.S. 647, 56 S.Ct. 307, 80 L.Ed. 460; Hamilton Gas Co. v. Watters, 296 U.S. 647, 56 S.Ct. 309, 80 L.Ed. On June 21, 1934, decree was entered holding......
-
Cantley v. M.-K.-T. Railroad Co., No. 38606.
...Pass R. Co. v. Wagner, 241 U.S. 476, 36 S. Ct. 626, 60 L. Ed. 1110; Walton v. Southern Pac. Co., 48 Pac. (2d) 108, certiorari denied, 56 S. Ct. 308; Vigor v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 101 Fed. (2d) 865; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Smith, 42 Fed. (2d) 111; Cochran v. Pittsburgh & L.E.R. Co......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Smith, No. 37831.
...including particularly: State ex rel. Cities Service Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm., 337 Mo. 809, 85 S.W. (2d) 890, certiorari denied 80 L. Ed. 461; State ex rel. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service Comm., 93 S.W. (2d) 675. (2) The exemption from the Sales Tax Act specificall......
-
Barnes v. Whelan, Nos. 81-1535
...the time of filing. See, e.g., Watters v. Hamilton Gas Co., 10 F.Supp. 323, 326 (S.D.W.Va.), aff'd, 79 F.2d 428 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 647, 56 S.Ct. 307, 80 L.Ed. 460 (1935). 20 We cannot say Congress intended to change the meaning of "principal assets" when it included that phr......
-
Watters v. Hamilton Gas Co., No. 2889.
...438. In both of these decisions, certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States was sought and refused, Hamilton Gas. Co. v. Harper, 296 U.S. 647, 56 S.Ct. 307, 80 L.Ed. 460; Hamilton Gas Co. v. Watters, 296 U.S. 647, 56 S.Ct. 309, 80 L.Ed. On June 21, 1934, decree was entered holding......
-
Cantley v. M.-K.-T. Railroad Co., No. 38606.
...Pass R. Co. v. Wagner, 241 U.S. 476, 36 S. Ct. 626, 60 L. Ed. 1110; Walton v. Southern Pac. Co., 48 Pac. (2d) 108, certiorari denied, 56 S. Ct. 308; Vigor v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 101 Fed. (2d) 865; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Smith, 42 Fed. (2d) 111; Cochran v. Pittsburgh & L.E.R. Co......
Request a trial to view additional results