Southern Railway Company v. United States, No. 28
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Van Devanter |
| Citation | 32 S.Ct. 2,56 L.Ed. 72,222 U.S. 20 |
| Parties | SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plff. in Err., v. UNITED STATES |
| Docket Number | No. 28 |
| Decision Date | 30 October 1911 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
232 practice notes
-
Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn., No. 33525.
...an exhaustive review of the applicable cases, among them B. & O. Railroad Co. v. Hooven, supra; Southern Ry. Co. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20, 25, 26, 32 Sup. Ct. 2, 56 L. Ed. 72; Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Rigsby, 241 U.S. 33, 41, 36 Sup. Ct. 482, 60 L. Ed. 874; Southern Ry. Co. v. Snyder, 1......
-
United States v. Abdulmutallab, No. 12–1207.
...as well as the regulation of instrumentalities and channels of interstate commerce. See [739 F.3d 906]Southern R. Co. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20, 26–27, 32 S.Ct. 2, 56 L.Ed. 72 (1911); see also United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 558, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995). Count Six, ......
-
U.S. v Parish of Jefferson, 5
...only from intrastate activities." Lopez, 514 U.S. at 558 (citing Shreveport Rate Cases, 234 U.S. 342 (1914), S. Ry. Co. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20 (1911), and Perez v. United States, 402 U.S. 146 (1971)). "Congressional regulation or protection of persons or things that move in interstat......
-
U.S. v. Wilson, No. 95-1871
...category, the Court has cited Shreveport Rate Cases, 234 U.S. 342, 34 S.Ct. 833, 58 L.Ed. 1341 (1914), Southern Ry. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20, 32 S.Ct. 2, 56 L.Ed. 72 (1911), and two examples cited in Perez, the destruction of an aircraft (18 U.S.C. Sec. 32) and thefts from interstate s......
Request a trial to view additional results
231 cases
-
Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn., No. 33525.
...an exhaustive review of the applicable cases, among them B. & O. Railroad Co. v. Hooven, supra; Southern Ry. Co. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20, 25, 26, 32 Sup. Ct. 2, 56 L. Ed. 72; Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Rigsby, 241 U.S. 33, 41, 36 Sup. Ct. 482, 60 L. Ed. 874; Southern Ry. Co. v. Snyder, 1......
-
United States v. Abdulmutallab, No. 12–1207.
...as well as the regulation of instrumentalities and channels of interstate commerce. See [739 F.3d 906]Southern R. Co. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20, 26–27, 32 S.Ct. 2, 56 L.Ed. 72 (1911); see also United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 558, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995). Count Six, ......
-
U.S. v Parish of Jefferson, 5
...only from intrastate activities." Lopez, 514 U.S. at 558 (citing Shreveport Rate Cases, 234 U.S. 342 (1914), S. Ry. Co. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20 (1911), and Perez v. United States, 402 U.S. 146 (1971)). "Congressional regulation or protection of persons or things that move in interstat......
-
U.S. v. Wilson, No. 95-1871
...category, the Court has cited Shreveport Rate Cases, 234 U.S. 342, 34 S.Ct. 833, 58 L.Ed. 1341 (1914), Southern Ry. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20, 32 S.Ct. 2, 56 L.Ed. 72 (1911), and two examples cited in Perez, the destruction of an aircraft (18 U.S.C. Sec. 32) and thefts from interstate s......
Request a trial to view additional results