Southern Ry. Co. v. Penny

Decision Date02 August 1927
Docket Number8 Div. 549
PartiesSOUTHERN RY. CO. v. PENNY.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Rehearing Denied Oct. 4, 1927

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; Norman Gunn, Special Judge.

Action for damages by Mrs. Maggie Penny, as next friend of Mamie Falls, a minor, against the Southern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

$1,000 damages for railroad's furnishing half-fare ticket to one applying and paying for full-fare ticket held not excessive.

Count 1 of the complaint is as follows:

"1. Plaintiff claims of defendant the sum of five thousand dollars as damages for this, to wit: Mamie Falls is a minor of the age of 15 years. Southern Railway Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Virginia, and engaged in business as a common carrier of passengers in the state of Alabama and other states. On, to wit, September 17, 1925, said Mamie Falls bought from the ticket agent of defendant, at its station in Sheffield Alabama, a ticket to ride as a passenger by train from Sheffield, Alabama, to Paragould, Arkansas. In purchase of the ticket inquiry was made of defendant's agent as to the price of a full-fare ticket between said two points, and he quoted the rate at $8.50. Thereupon request was made for a full-fare ticket between said points, and payment was made to the said agent by the delivery of a $10 bill, and he returned a ticket good for passage between said two points. The said ticket called for passage over the lines of the Southern Railway Company to Memphis, Tennessee, and over the lines of the Missouri Pacific Railway from Memphis, Tennessee, to Paragould, Arkansas, and the said agent of defendant collected the full price of $8.50 which he had designated as the price of the fare for an adult in payment for said railway ticket. Said Mamie Falls, as the owner of said ticket, used the same in traveling as far as Memphis Tennessee, on her proposed journey from Sheffield, Alabama to Paragould, Arkansas. At Memphis, Tennessee, she transferred, according to the ticket so sold her by the defendant, to the train of the Missouri Pacific Railroad bound for Paragould, Arkansas. At the hour of about 10 o'clock at night, on the said Missouri Pacific train, and while undertaking to travel on the said ticket so sold her, the conductor in charge of said train asked the said Mamie Falls her age. She replied that she was 15 years old, and he thereupon spoke harshly, rudely, and abusively to her, and said that she was undertaking to travel on a half-fare ticket, in violation of right and law. Said Mamie Falls then and there replied to the said conductor that she had ordered and paid for a full-fare ticket at the price of $8.50, from Sheffield, Alabama, to Paragould, Arkansas, and that she was not undertaking to travel on a half-fare ticket, and that, having paid a full fare for what was held out to her as a full-fare ticket, she had a right to ride on the same to the destination specified in said ticket, to wit, Paragould, Arkansas. Then and there the said conductor denied the right of said Mamie Falls to continue further her journey on the said ticket, and threatened to stop the train and put her off then and there in the nighttime, alone and between stations, and where she was unacquainted and had no friends. The said conductor further commanded the said Mamie Falls to pay him the additional sum of $1.83 as a condition for her continuing further on said journey. The said Mamie Falls replied that she had only $1 and could not pay money which she did not have. The said conductor thereupon further said that he would not accept $1, and would allow her only a few minutes to produce the $1.83, and if she failed in so doing he would stop the train and eject her in the nighttime and in the remote country where the train then was; all this to the great shock, fright, humiliation, and pain of the said Mamie Falls, then and there by the said actions of the said conductor so in charge of the said train, and said Mamie Falls was put to the further humiliation of violent weeping, which she could not avoid in the circumstances, and attracting the attention of passengers on the train to her humiliated predicament; and she was further forced, in order to save herself from ejection from said train and consequent danger to her life and health, to receive financial aid from a stranger who was a passenger on said train, and was further and in this manner forced by the said conductor then and there to pay to him the additional sum of $1.83 for the completion of her transportation to Paragould, Arkansas, the point of destination named in her ticket which she had procured from the defendant. And the said Mamie Falls, by the said fright which she then and there suffered, was made sick and nervous, and her health was permanently injured.
"And plaintiff says and alleges that the ticket actually delivered by the agent of the defendant in discharge of his duties as ticket agent at Sheffield, Alabama, to the said Mamie Falls, in exchange for the price paid to him of a full-fare ticket, to wit, the sum of $8.50, was a half-fare ticket. And plaintiff further alleges that the action of the said ticket agent of defendant so in discharge of his duty was negligent and wrongful, and that as a proximate consequence of the said wrong so perpetrated the said Mamie Falls suffered financial loss and physical pain and illness, and fright and mental suffering, all to plaintiff's damage in the sum aforesaid."

The following requested charges were refused to defendant:

"E. Even though you might find from the evidence that the conductor was rude to Mamie Falls while she was a passenger on her way from Memphis, Tenn., to Paragould, Ark., you would not be authorized to find a verdict against the defendant."
"F. Even though you might find from the evidence that Mr. Dickey, the conductor, threatened to put Mamie Falls off the train while she was a passenger, you would not be authorized to find a verdict for plaintiff on that account."
"H. You would not be authorized to compensate plaintiff for any future anxiety or humiliation she may suffer on account of the conduct of the conductor of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company."

A.H. Carmichael, of Tuscumbia, and Stokely, Scrivner, Dominick & Smith, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Mitchell & Hughston and Orlan B. Hill, Jr., all of Florence, for appellee.

BRICKEN P.J.

On the 17th day of September, 1925, Mamie Falls, a girl about 15 years old, through her aunt, Mrs. Maggie Penny, applied to the ticket agent of the appellant, at Sheffield, Ala., for the purchase of a full-fare ticket from Sheffield, Ala., to Paragould, Ark. The agent was advised that the ticket was desired for a girl who had never traveled alone, or who was not accustomed to traveling alone, and that it was desired that Mamie Falls should not be inconvenienced or troubled. The agent replied, "There will be no danger, unless the train goes in a ditch." The purchaser of the ticket was informed by the agent that the price of a full-fare ticket was $8.50, which was then and there paid to him, and a ticket was delivered to her.

Mamie Falls embarked on her journey on a train of defendant carrier, and was safely transported on said ticket to Memphis, Tenn., by said carrier. At Memphis there was a change of trains, and that night, about 10 o'clock, Mamie Falls boarded a train of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, over whose lines said ticket was sold, for the completion of her journey. Shortly after the young passenger had boarded the train at Memphis, the conductor of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, while taking up his tickets, came to Mamie Falls and asked her for her ticket, and when the same was handed to him he asked her how old she was, and, on being informed that she was 15 years old, told her that she could not continue her passage on that ticket without paying $1.83 additional, which sum of money she did not have. Plaintiff, among other things, testified:

"That this conductor told her that she did not have any business riding on a half-fare ticket; also, 'You will have to pay the difference of $1.83,' and being advised by the girl that she had paid full fare for her ticket, and did not have on her person but one half dollar, that the conductor replied, 'You had better get busy and get it, if you don't want to walk back.' " That she was told by the conductor that she "had better get busy and pass your hat around, or he would put you off." That the conductor put his hand on the girl, and "told me I had better get busy and make up that collection, or borrow
it from some one, and he put his hand up like that and pulled something, and sounded like he was going to stop the train. That the conductor appeared to be angry, and that she got the remainder of the money from an old gentleman who was a passenger on the same train."

As to what happened when he called for the ticket, the conductor testified:

"When I got to the little girl, I asked her for her ticket, and she handed it to me, and I looked at it, and I saw the ticket was for a half-way ticket or half-fare ticket, and I looked at her and said, 'How old are you?' and she said, 'I am 15 years old,' and I says, 'What did you pay for this ticket?' and she says, '$8 and something;' and I didn't have any rate in my hand then, and I couldn't tell what the rate was, and I said to her, 'I can't carry you on this half-fare ticket;' and I says, 'The law won't let me carry you on a half-fare ticket;' and she began to cry before I could say anything to her; and I says, 'How much money have you got?' and she says, 'I haven't got but 50 cents;' and I says, 'We'll try to raise the money for you.' "

On the 7th day of ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Aaron v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1960
    ...motion to quash. No doubt the motion to strike was oral. It should have been in writing. § 214, Title 7, Code 1940; Southern Ry. Co. v. Penny, 22 Ala.App. 199, 114 So. 15. Cf. Weller & Sons v. Rensford, 185 Ala. 333, 64 So. As far as this record indicates, the trial court struck the first t......
  • Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Rush
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • August 2, 1927
  • Howard v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1965
    ...merit.' Aaron v. State, 271 Ala. 70, 122 So.2d 360; W. L. Weller & Sons v. Rensford, 185 Ala. 333, 64 So. 366; Southern R. Co. v. Penny, 22 Ala.App. 199, 114 So. 15. There was no merit in the contention that because Negroes had not voted on the court officials that they were not qualified t......
  • Anderson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 1927
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT