Southern Ry. Co v. Williams, (No. 7952.)
| Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
| Writing for the Court | luke |
| Citation | 19 Ga.App. 544,91 S.E. 1001 |
| Parties | SOUTHERN RY. CO. et al. v. WILLIAMS. |
| Docket Number | (No. 7952.) |
| Decision Date | 20 March 1917 |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from City Court of Hall County; A. C. Wheeler, Judge.
Action by J. A. Williams against the Southern Railway Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring* error. Affirmed.
Edgar A. Neely, of Atlanta, J. O. Adams and Ed Quillian, both of Gainesville, and C. R. Faulkner, of Bellton, for plaintiffs in error.
W. A. Charters, W. B. Sloan, and W. M. Oliver, all of Gainesville, for defendant in error.
luke, J. Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
15 cases
-
Pinson v. State, 11744.
......Satilla Pecari Orchard & Stock Co, 152 Ga. 538 (7), 110 S.E. 303; Jones v. Western & Atlantic R. Co, 23 Ga.App. 725 (5), 99 S.E. 388; Southern Railway Co. v. Williams, 19 Ga. App. 544, 91 S.E. 1001], or whether the request was too vague and indefinite in that it set forth no concrete ......
-
Pinson v. State
......Satilla Pecan Orchard & Stock Co., 152 Ga. 538(7), 110 S.E. 303; Jones v. Western & Atlantic R. Co., 23 Ga.App. 725(5), 99 S.E. 388; Southern. Railway Co. v. Williams, 19 Ga.App. 544, 91 S.E. 1001],. or whether the request was too vague and indefinite in that. it set forth no concrete ......
-
Smith v. State
...... court will be considered as presenting a question for. consideration by this court." Southern Ry. Co. v. Williams, 19 Ga.App. 544, 91 S.E. 1001 (4). . . Ground. 6 of the motion for a new trial is specifically abandoned ......
-
Hall v. State
......Bowen v. Smith-Hall Grocery Co., 146 Ga. 157(4), 91 S. E. 32; Smiley v. Smiley, 144 Ga. 546(2), 87 5. E. 60S; Southern Railway Co. v. Williams, 19 Ga. App. 544(4), 91 S. E. 1001. Under this ruling the fifth, sixth, and seventh grounds of the ......
Request a trial to view additional results