Southern Ry. Co. v. McCants
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
| Citation | Southern Ry. Co. v. McCants, 163 So. 363, 26 Ala.App. 442 (Ala. App. 1935) |
| Decision Date | 16 April 1935 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 632 |
| Parties | SOUTHERN RY. CO. v. McCANTS. |
Rehearing Denied June 4, 1935
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; John Denson, Judge.
Action for wrongful arrest and malicious prosecution by Robert McCants against the Southern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Southern Railway Co. v McCants (6 Div. 804) 163 So. 365.
Stokely, Scrivner, Dominick & Smith, of Birmingham, for appellant.
Harsh Harsh & Hare, of Birmingham, for appellee.
We deem it unnecessary to undertake to formulate a statement of the exact degree of binding force, against the party, which assertions of a party's counsel made in opening his case before the court and jury possess.
It seems all but conceded that said statements have considerable weight; and considerable, under the circumstances that here appear, is sufficient as a basis for our decision.
As we understand this case, if appellee was on or upon appellant's train, at the time and place fixed by all the testimony, he was, or at least it was open to the jury to find that he was, guilty of a violation of the terms of section 6026 of the Code of the city of Birmingham of 1930 to wit, being "found on the premises of another in the night time, under suspicious circumstances."
Whether or not appellee was or was not upon said train at the time he was arrested became, then, a vital fact to be considered by the jury. Their verdict seems of necessity to have been based upon the finding that he was not upon the train at said time.
Upon this finding, we observe that appellee's distinguished counsel, in making his opening statement to the jury, used the following language:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Wilkey v. State ex rel. Smith
... ... involving the effect of opening statements to the jury as ... admissions of fact. The pertinent decision was in ... Southern Railway Co. v. McCants, 26 Ala. App. 442, ... 163 So. 363, wherein the Court of Appeals stated that weight ... should be given to opening ... ...
-
McGuire v. State
... ... State, ... 206 Ala. 56, 89 So. 69, therein cited. These questions need ... no re-discussion here ... The ... case of Southern R. Co. v. McCants, 26 Ala.App. 442, ... 163 So. 363, certiorari denied 231 Ala. 22, 163 So. 365, ... furnishes no basis for defendant's insistence ... ...
- Daniel v. Ormand
- Hingle v. State