Southern Ry. Co. v. McCants, 6 Div. 632
Decision Date | 16 April 1935 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 632 |
Citation | 26 Ala.App. 442,163 So. 363 |
Parties | SOUTHERN RY. CO. v. McCANTS. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied June 4, 1935
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; John Denson, Judge.
Action for wrongful arrest and malicious prosecution by Robert McCants against the Southern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Southern Railway Co. v McCants (6 Div. 804) 163 So. 365.
Stokely, Scrivner, Dominick & Smith, of Birmingham, for appellant.
Harsh Harsh & Hare, of Birmingham, for appellee.
We deem it unnecessary to undertake to formulate a statement of the exact degree of binding force, against the party, which assertions of a party's counsel made in opening his case before the court and jury possess.
It seems all but conceded that said statements have considerable weight; and considerable, under the circumstances that here appear, is sufficient as a basis for our decision.
As we understand this case, if appellee was on or upon appellant's train, at the time and place fixed by all the testimony, he was, or at least it was open to the jury to find that he was, guilty of a violation of the terms of section 6026 of the Code of the city of Birmingham of 1930 to wit, being "found on the premises of another in the night time, under suspicious circumstances."
Whether or not appellee was or was not upon said train at the time he was arrested became, then, a vital fact to be considered by the jury. Their verdict seems of necessity to have been based upon the finding that he was not upon the train at said time.
Upon this finding, we observe that appellee's distinguished counsel, in making his opening statement to the jury, used the following language:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wilkey v. State ex rel. Smith, 6 Div. 603.
... ... admissions of fact. The pertinent decision was in ... Southern Railway Co. v. McCants, 26 Ala. App. 442, ... 163 So. 363, wherein the Court of Appeals stated ... ...
-
McGuire v. State
...194 So. 815 239 Ala. 315 MCGUIRE v. STATE. 6 Div. 374.Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 25, 1940 ... The ... case of Southern R. Co. v. McCants, 26 Ala.App. 442, ... 163 So. 363, ... ...
-
Daniel v. Ormand
...163 So. 361 26 Ala.App. 441 DANIEL v. ORMAND. 6 Div. 572Court of Appeals of AlabamaApril 16, 1935 ... ...
- Hingle v. State, 7 Div. 53