Southern Ry. Co. v. McIntyre

Decision Date02 July 1907
Citation44 So. 624,152 Ala. 223
PartiesSOUTHERN RY. CO. v. MCINTYRE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; Marvin West, Special Judge.

Action by Rufus P. McIntyre against the Southern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

The first count of the complaint, after describing the land alleged to have been trespassed upon, the improvements thereon, and that the defendant is a railway corporation engaged in the operation of trains, etc., alleges that on or about the 1st day of December, 1904, the defendant caused an excavation two or three feet deep to be made on and across plaintiff's property, to wit, the northeast end thereof and has constructed or caused to be constructed a railroad track in said excavation on plaintiff's land, and proposes to propel by steam engines and cars, for the purpose of transportation, etc. Plaintiff then avers that the entry on his land by the railroad company as aforesaid was without his consent and without making him any compensation therefor and that certain parts of his property have been rendered wholly useless to him, and the value of the remainder of his property has been greatly decreased, etc. It is alleged that the property was bounded on one side by Sycamore street and Walter street. This count was afterwards amended by adding the following: "Plaintiff alleges that in constructing the said railroad tracks at the intersection of Sycamore and Water street, along Water street, and across Sycamore street immediately preceding and leading to the excavation upon plaintiff's property as aforesaid, the defendant made or caused to be made a high embankment, to wit, seven feet high upon that part of the street nearest the plaintiff's property, to wit, beween plaintiff's lot and the center of said street, upon which defendant constructed or caused to be constructed a railroad track, of which the track in the excavation on plaintiff's property is a continuation or extension; and plaintiff avers that by reason of said embankment travel along Sycamore street from plaintiff's property to the river and from the river to plaintiff's property is obstructed and prevented, except by foot, and travel from plaintiff's property up and down Water street impeded, except by foot." It is also alleged that defendant is authorized to do business in the state of Alabama, and was at the time complained of. Demurrers...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Chrysler Corp. v. Hassell
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 5 Julio 1973
    ...W.O.W. v. Carrell, 218 Ala. 613, 119 So. 640; Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Payne, 192 Ala. 69, 68 So. 359; Southern Railway Co. v. McIntyre, 152 Ala. 223, 44 So. 624. We have shown where there is more than one distinct cause of action alleged in Count Four--A. The joining of an actio......
  • Merritt v. Coffin
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 2 Julio 1907
  • Alabama Power Co. v. Cornelius
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 10 Abril 1924
    ... ... laying the tract and an independent wrong as to the operation ... of trains. In the case of So. R. R. v. McIntyre, 152 ... Ala. 223, 44 So. 624, the count condemned charges trespass on ... the plaintiff's premises and in addition thereto that ... defendant ... ...
  • Interstate Lumber Co. v. Duke
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 5 Junio 1913
    ... ... case. City Delivery Co. v. Henry, 139 Ala. 161, 34 ... So. 389; Sou. Ry. Co. v. McIntyre, 152 Ala. 223, 44 ... So. 624. In the record proper a demurrer appears as addressed ... to amended count 3 and the judgment entry shows a ruling ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT