Southern Spring Bed Co. v. State Corp. Commission
Citation | 205 Va. 272,136 S.E.2d 900 |
Decision Date | 15 June 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 5813,5813 |
Court | Supreme Court of Virginia |
Parties | SOUTHERN SPRING BED COMPANY v. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION. Record |
Page 900
v.
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION.
[205 Va. 273] William G. Vance (Murray Janus; Harold E. Abrams; Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers, McClatchey & Regenstein, on brief), for the appellant.
D. Gardiner Tyler, Assistant Attorney General (Robert Y. Button, Attorney General, on brief), for the appellee.
JUDGE: EGGLESTON
EGGLESTON, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal of right from an order of the State Corporation Commission finding that Southern Spring Bed Company, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Virginia, had amended its articles of incorporation on February 6, 1963 authorizing it to issue 300,000 shares of no par value common stock, and had tendered to the Clerk of the Commission, for filing in this State, a duly authenticated copy of such amendment but failed and refused to pay to the Commonwealth of Virginia the fees in the amount of $505 required by law for the filing of such amendment. By the further terms of the order, judgment was entered in favor of the Commonwealth of Virginia against Southern Spring Bed Company for that amount, with the direction that unless it be paid on or before a specified date 'all authority' of Southern to transact business in this State should be revoked.
Southern Spring Bed Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the
Page 901
State of Georgia and has heretofore been authorized to do business in Virginia. On February 6, 1963 its charter was amended 'so as to increase the authorized capital from 150,000 shares of No Par Value Common Stock to 300,000 shares of No Par Value Common Stock.'When Southern filed with the Clerk of the State Corporation Commission of Virginia a duly authenticated copy of the amendment to its charter it tendered a filing fee of $5.00, as required by Code, 1956 Replacement Vol., § 13.1-123(a)(11). This section provides that the Commission shall charge and collect a fee of $5.00 for filing 'an application of a foreign corporation for certificate of authority to transact business in this State.' The clerk refused to file the amendment unless and until Southern had paid an additional 'entrance fee' of $500, which he deemed required under the provisions of Code, §§ 58-445 and 58-462.
On a hearing on a rule issued against Southern, the Commission entered the order appealed from.
[205 Va. 274] Section 58-445 provides that whenever by articles of amendment the maximum authorized capital stock of any domestic or foreign corporation is increased, the charter or entrance fee to be charged shall be an amount equal to the difference between the amount already paid as a charter or entrance fee by such corporation and the amount that would be require to be paid if the increased maximum authorized capital stock were being stated at that time in the original articles of incorporation.
Section 58-462...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
7-Eleven, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality, Record No. 2380-01-2 (Va. App. 12/10/2002), Record No. 2380-01-2.
...trial court to give deference to an Agency's interpretation of the legislation. As noted in Southern Spring Bed Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 205 Va. 272, 275, 136 S.E.2d 900, 902 (1964), "the construction given to a statute by public officials charged with its enforcement is entitled to great......
-
7-ELEVEN v. DEPT. OF ENV. QUALITY, Record No. 2380-01-2.
...trial court to give deference to an Agency's interpretation of the legislation. As noted in Southern Spring Bed Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 205 Va. 272, 275, 136 S.E.2d 900, 902 (1964), "the construction given to a statute by public officials charged with its enforcement is entitled to great......
-
Diaz v. WILDERNESS RESORT ASS'N, Record No. 1846-09-2.
...is entitled to great weight by the courts and in doubtful cases will be regarded as decisive," S. Spring Bed Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 205 Va. 272, 275, 136 S.E.2d 900, 902 (1964), "when an issue involves a pure question of statutory interpretation, that issue does not invoke the agency's ......
-
Evelyn v. Com., Record No. 2945-04-2.
...Va. 997, 1002, 81 S.E.2d 620, 623 (1954), and "in doubtful cases will be regarded as decisive," S. Spring Bed Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 205 Va. 272, 275, 136 S.E.2d 900, 902 Thus, the right to erect a "pier" as that term is used in Code § 62.1-164 must be construed in harmony with the prov......