Southwestern Co v. Wright Same v. State of Georgia
Decision Date | 04 January 1886 |
Citation | 6 S.Ct. 375,29 L.Ed. 626,116 U.S. 231 |
Parties | SOUTHWESTERN R. CO. v. WRIGHT, Comptroller General, etc., and others. SAME v. STATE OF GEORGIA. Filed |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
R. F. Lyon, A. R. Lawton, and Thos. B. Gresham, for plaintiffs in error.
Clifford Anderson and Saml. Barnett, for defendants in error.
These suits relate to the liability of the Southwestern Railroad Company, a Georgia corporation, for taxes on different parts of its railroad, and the federal question involved arises under a claim of a charter contract of exemption from all taxation beyond 'a tax of one-half of one per cent. upon its annual net income.' The company owns and operates (1) a road from Macon through Fort Valley, Americus, Smithville, and Cuthbert to Fort Gaines; (2) a road from Smithville to Albany; (3) a road from Albany to Arlington; (4) a road from Cuthbert to Eufaula; and (5) a road from Fort Valley to Columbus. The line of all these roads is shown on the following plat:
The road from Macon to Americus and from Smithville to Fort Gaines was built under the original charter of the company, granted December 14, 1845. Section 14 of this charter is as follows:
From Americus through Smithville to Albany the building was done by the Georgia & Florida Railroad Company, under a charter granted January 22, 1852. Section 2 of this charter is as follows:
'That the Georgia & Florida Railroad Company may, at any time, incorporate their stock with the stock of any other company, on such terms as may be mutually agreed upon by such companies: provided, that the road and other property of this company shall be subject to such taxation as the legislature may deem equitable and just.'
After this part of the road was finished, the Georgia & Florida Company agreed with the South western Company to consolidate its stock with that of the Southwestern, and thereupon it delivered its road, then running from Americus to Albany, into the possession of the Southwestern Company. This having been done, the general assembly of Georgia, on the nineteenth of December, 1859, passed an act which recited what has been done, and then enacted:
The Southwestern Company now holds this part of its road under this transfer.
The road from Albany to Arlington was built under an act of the general assembly passed December 18, 1860, as follows:
'An act to amend the several acts of the general assembly relating to the Southwestern Railroad Company, and to authorize the said company to construct a branch railroad, and for other purposes.
The road from Cuthbert to Eufaula was built under the following act, passed February 23, 1850:
'An act to amend an act entitled 'An act to incorporate the Southwestern Rairoad Company, with power to extend branches to Albany, in the county of Baker, and Fort Gaines, in the county of Early, and to points below those places on the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers, and to punish those who may willfully injure the same, assented to December 27, 1845, and for other purposes.'
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Howard v. State, 8 Div. 464.
... ... assessment, improvement bonds of the city on the same ... project. From a judgment awarding the writ, the respondent ... ...
-
State v. Great Northern Railway Company
...An exemption from taxation contained in a railroad charter does not apply to extensions authorized by subsequent laws. Southwestern R. Co. v. Wright, 116 U.S. 231; Wilmington & W.R. Co. v. Alsbrook, 146 U.S. Chicago, B. & K.C.R. Co. v. Guffey, 120 U.S. 569; Baltimore v. Mayor, 89 Md. 89. Pr......
-
Ga. Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Atlanta Gas Light Co
...orders of the Public Service Commission can be reviewed. In Southwestern Railroad v. Wright, 68 Ga. 311(1), affirmed in 116 U.S. 231, 6 S.Ct. 375, 29 L.Ed. 626, it was held that, "Where any ministerial officer of this State is attempting to collect money out of a person, natural or artifici......
-
In re Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 4829.
...Co. v. Georgia, 92 U.S. 665, 23 L.Ed. 757; Southwestern R. v. Georgia, 92 U.S. 676, note, 23 L.Ed. 762; Southwestern R. Co. v. Wright, 116 U.S. 231, 6 S.Ct. 375, 29 L.Ed. 626; Wright v. Georgia R. & Banking Co., 216 U.S. 420, 30 S.Ct. 242, 54 L.Ed. 544; Wright v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.,......