Sovereign Camp, W.O.W. v. Craft
Decision Date | 23 November 1922 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 503. |
Citation | 208 Ala. 467,94 So. 831 |
Parties | SOVEREIGN CAMP, W. O. W., v. CRAFT. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; J. C. B. Gwin, Judge.
Action by Annie F. Craft against the Sovereign Camp of the Woodman of the World. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Plaintiff the widow of William R. Craft, sues to recover a benefit of $1,000 under a beneficiary certificate issued by the defendant association to said Craft on May 17, 1916, and designating plaintiff as sole beneficiary.
Another count of the complaint alleges that said certificate contains an agreement by defendant "to pay to the plaintiff as beneficiary therein named the sum of $100 for the erection of a monument to the memory of said William R. Craft," payment of which has been refused by defendant; wherefore plaintiff claims said sum for said purpose.
Demurrers to the complaint being overruled, defendant pleaded the general issue and 19 special pleas. Demurrers were sustained to each of these pleas except those numbered 4, 5, 7, 9, and 18, and the cause went to trial on these special pleas and the general issue.
Plea 4 adopts the following portion of plea 3:
And adds the following:
Plea 5 is the same as plea 4 down through the sections of defendant's constitution therein set out, and it then concludes:
Plea 7 is:
"Defendant *** tendered to the plaintiff the amount due her, to wit, $47.50, before this action was commenced, and now brings the money into court."
Plea 9 is as follows:
Plea 18 is as follows:
C. H. Roquemore, of Montgomery, for appellant.
John T. Glover and Charles A. Calhoun, both of Birmingham, for appellee.
In denial of plaintiff's right to recover under the beneficiary certificate exhibited by her, defendant sets up two defenses: (1) The invalidation of the certificate by reason of the member's warranty or representation that his occupation was that of a carpenter, when in fact he was not a carpenter; and (2) the invalidation of the certificate by reason of the member's employment in a mine, and his failure to pay the thereby increased assessment of $3.60 per annum, as required by section 43 of the constitution and laws of the society.
These defenses embraced the only contested issues of fact in the case.
Defendant's theory is: (1) That the member's representation-"my occupation is carpenter"-was a warranty that he did no work except that of a carpenter under his existing employment; and (2) that if the member regularly worked, or did any work, in the course of his employment, whether as a carpenter or otherwise, within the mine at which he was employed, this brought him within the class of "those employed in mines," within the meaning of section 43 of defendant's constitution and laws.
1. According to the New Standard Dictionary "occupation" means ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Maryland Cas. Co. v. Hughes
... ... Fidelity & Guar. Co., 190 A.D. 6, 179 N.Y.S. 454; ... Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. Craft, 208 ... Ala. 467, 94 So. 831; ... ...
-
Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. Secrest
... ... occupation as his true occupation. In the case of ... Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Craft, 208 Ala. 467, 94 ... So. 831, a carpenter gave ... ...
-
Benefit Association of Ry. Employees v. Secrest
...and engage in another business, yet properly give his regular occupation as his true occupation. In the case of Sovereign Camp. W.O.W. v. Craft, 208 Ala. 467, 94 So. 831, a carpenter gave his occupation as a "carpenter" although he was at the time employed as a "handy-man" in an ore mine. I......
-
Sovereign Camp, W.O.W. v. Carrell
... ... by the association, but it has been held that suit may be ... brought for breach of contract. Sov. Camp, W. O. W., v ... Craft, 208 Ala. 467, 94 So. 831 ... The ... failure to file a certified copy of the 1919 amendments to ... the constitution and laws of the ... ...