Sovereign Camp, W.O.W., v. Ballard
Decision Date | 08 May 1923 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 420. |
Citation | 97 So. 895,19 Ala.App. 411 |
Parties | SOVEREIGN CAMP, W. O. W., v. BALLARD. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied Oct. 16, 1923.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lowndes County; A. E. Gamble, Judge.
Action on policy of insurance by Mrs. J. R. Ballard against the Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Ex parte Ballard, 97 So. 901.
C. H Roquemore, of Montgomery, for appellant.
Powell & Hamilton, of Greenville, for appellee.
Defendant is a fraternal order, issuing to its members certificates or policies insuring their lives against death, etc., in accordance with the terms of the certificates, which embrace the constitution and by-laws of the organization. Plaintiff is the beneficiary named in the certificate issued to her son, who was a member of the order, at Plant City, in the state of Florida, and to him, through the local camp at Plant City, Fla., was issued the certificate sued on in this case. One of the vital conditions named in the certificate was:
This certificate was signed by the officials of the order and accepted in writing by the member, in which he declared as follows:
By Section 110 of defendant's constitution the member was required to pay certain assessments by the first day of each month succeeding the issue of the certificate, and, failing to make such payment, the member stands suspended, and during such suspension the certificate is void. Section 116 of the constitution provides for reinstatement as follows:
The member complied with all these requirements to and including August 1, 1918. On September 1 and October 1, 1918, he failed to make the required payments. On October 14th, while the member was ill and in a hospital in Montgomery, Ala., his wife wrote a letter to the clerk of the local camp of defendant at Plant City, Fla stating the reason why the assessments had not been paid, and notifying the clerk of the member's then ill health and his confinement in the hospital, whereupon the defendant's local clerk, on October 16th, who was charged with the duty of collecting the assessment, and through whom alone payment was provided, issued to the member receipts for the two assessments, and informing him that he was reinstated and in good standing. On October 17th the member died of the illness of which he was confined in the hospital. The member did not comply with that condition of his certificate providing that, in addition to the payment of arrearages, he shall deliver to him (the local clerk) a written statement and warranty signed by himself and witnessed that he is in good health, and not addicted to the excessive use of intoxicants or narcotics, as a condition precedent to reinstatement. Nor could he comply with section 119 of the order, which provides:
"No suspended member shall be reinstated whose health is at the time impaired,"
it being admitted at this time the member was in the hospital sick of a disease from which he died the next day.
The foregoing facts were sufficiently pleaded in count 2 of the complaint, stating the cause of action, and defendant's pleas 1 to 9, both inclusive. Plaintiff replied to defendant's pleas as follows:
Demurrers were filed to these pleas demurrers were overruled, and rejoinders were then filed, to which demurrers were sustained except as to rejoinder 5. Issue was joined on this this rejoinder along with the general issue, which was interposed at each step of the pleading. The foregoing sufficiently states the facts in the case made by the pleading, except in so far as it may become necessary to allude to the evidence in a further consideration of the various propositions presented in this appeal.
Briefs for appellant were filed on the submission, which, while not strictly complying with Supreme Court rule 10 (175 Ala. xviii, 61 South. vii), will be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sovereign Camp, W.O.W. v. Carrell
...206 Ala. 18, 89 So. 528; Sov. Camp v. Maynor, 206 Ala. 176, 89 So. 750; Sov. Camp v. Blanks, 208 Ala. 449, 94 So. 554; Sov. Camp. v. Ballard, 19 Ala. App. 411, 97 So. 895. A member must pay assessments as the law requires, and habit of a clerk of a local camp to call for payment after delin......
-
Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Hynde
... ... W., 8 A. L. R. 478; ... Sov. Camp, W. O. W. v. Gay, 93 So. 559; Sov ... Camp, W. O. W. v. Adams, 86 So. 737; Sov. Camp, W ... O. W. v. Ballard, 97 So. 895; Independent Order v ... Moncref, 50 So. 558 (Miss.); Kennedy v. Grand ... Fraternity, 92 P. 791; Sov. Camp. v. Anderson, ... 202 ... ...
- Cole v. State
- Brewington v. State