Sovereign Camp, WOW v. Gillespie
Decision Date | 12 March 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 10630,10634.,10630 |
Parties | SOVEREIGN CAMP, W. O. W., v. GILLESPIE et al. YELL COUNTY, ARK., et al. v. SAME. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Henry Donham, of Little Rock, Ark. (Sam Rorex and Martin K. Fulk, both of Little Rock, Ark., on the brief), for appellant Woodmen of the World.
Thomas Boyers, Lewis Robinson, and F. D. Majors, all of Dardanelle, Ark., for appellants Yell County, Ark., and others.
Wallace Townsend, of Little Rock, Ark. (James G. Martin, Thomas E. Elcock, and Allen A. Schaefer, all of Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for appellees.
Before GARDNER, WOODROUGH, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World, is the owner of funding bonds issued by Yell County, Ark., in 1925, payable out of a general property tax levy of not to exceed three mills. It has appealed to reverse a decree in equity which held other bonds issued by the county three years later to be valid, put them on a parity with the Woodmen's bonds and required the proceeds of the three-mill tax to be apportioned between the holders of the different bond issues; the part allotted to the Woodmen being insufficient to service its bonds. Yell County claims the later issued bonds are invalid and also appeals from the decree. The two appeals have been heard together.
The amendment to the Constitution of Arkansas now known as amendment No. 10 adopted by vote December 7, 1924, authorized counties in the state to issue bonds to secure funds to pay the county indebtedness outstanding on the date of the adoption of the amendment and to levy a tax on all property in the county not exceeding three mills per annum to pay the bonds and interest. Procedure for such bond issue was prescribed by the Act of March 23, 1925 (pp. 608 to 612) as follows:
In 1925 Yell County availed itself of the authority granted by the amendment (No. 10), and the county court of the county ascertained and duly entered its order of record that the amount of the outstanding indebtedness of the county as of October 7, 1924, was $139,442.61, and after publication of the order, the funding bonds of the county in the amount of the indebtedness ($139,000) were issued and a tax levy of one and three-quarters mills was made to meet them. They were duly sold and the appellant Woodmen of the World is the owner of a portion of them aggregating $89,000. At the time of the issue of the bonds the assessed value of the property in the county was over $6,000,000 and there was a liberal margin between the one and three-quarters mills then required to service the bond issue and the maximum of three mills which the constitution authorized and the statute required to be levied for them "if said tax proves insufficient to meet the maturities of the bonds with interest." Section 4. But the assessed value of property in the county declined so that in 1932 it was one-half of what it was in 1925 and, although it has since increased, the one and three-quarters mills levy is insufficient to service the Woodmen's bonds. The whole three mills would suffice if available for the purpose.
But in April, 1928, about three years after the funding bond issue had been made, the county court of Yell County undertook to make a new adjudication of the outstanding indebtedness of the county as of the date of the adoption of the constitutional amendment December 7, 1924, and determined that such indebtedness was $210,880.96 instead of $139,442.61 found to be outstanding and funded in 1925, and that there was a balance of $71,880.96 which the county was entitled to fund but which had not been funded. The new order of the court was entered of record and was published and, no suit being brought against it, additional 4½ per cent. funding bonds were issued in the sum of $83,000 (that amount "being equivalent to bonds in the principal sum of $71,587.50 at the rate of 6 per cent. over the same period"). A tax of one and one-quarter mills was levied by the quorum court to service the new bonds, and that levy, together with the one and three-quarters mills levy for the original bonds, took the whole three mills authorized by the constitutional amendment. The supplemental bonds were in like form as the original issue and came into the hands of purchasers for value. The proceeds derived from the sale of the new bonds were not applied to any outstanding indebtedness of the county but were placed in the general fund and used for the construction of roads and bridges and purchase of rights of way. The principal of six of the new bonds matured in 1930, 1931, and 1932, and as the county had no funds to pay them, it made an order in 1931 that twelve other bonds of $500 each be issued to refund the matured bonds and the refunding bonds are also outstanding.
In 1934 default had been made in the payment of principal and interest of the first bond issue, and the Woodmen of the World, as owner of bonds of that issue in the amount of $89,000, brought a suit in the chancery court of Yell County to have the later bond issues declared void and to require the entire three mills tax levy to be applied to the payment of its bonds of the first issue. A taxpayer intervened and aligned himself with the plaintiff, and the chancery court found and decreed as prayed in the petition of the Woodmen of the World. But none of the holders of the later bond issues of 1928 and 1931 was made a party to the suit in the chancery court, and it does not appear to be seriously contended that the adjudication became binding upon them. Fetzer v. Johnson (C.C.A.8) 15 F.(2d) 145; Board of Education et al. v. James (C.C.A.10) 49 F.(2d) 91. Some of such holders of the bonds of the later issues brought this present suit on their own behalf and on behalf of all similarly situated in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, and a contrary decree to that of the chancery court was arrived at upholding the later bond issues as valid and requiring the proceeds of the three-mill tax to be ratably apportioned between the holders of the several bond issues.
It is contended for the Woodmen of the World under appropriate assignments of error that the provisions of the constitutional amendment, and the statute under which its bonds were issued, entered into and conditioned the contract between it as a bondholder and the county, and that the subsequent action of the county court and the quorum court in attempting to divert a part of the three-mill tax levy to the holders of the later bond issues impaired the obligation of the contract and deprived it as a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gillespie v. Yell County, Ark.
...different bond issues and applied as apportioned to satisfy the respective bond obligations. This court determined on the first appeal (87 F.2d 944) that the funding bonds issued by the County in 1925 acquired and held by the Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World had been issued in conformity......
-
Kurn v. Beasley, 11573.
...21, 1938, the order and the bonds issued thereunder are void. See Stahl v. Sibeck, 183 Ark. 1143, 40 S.W.2d 442; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Gillespie, 8 Cir., 87 F.2d 944. The appellants' contention is, however, without merit. The identical argument now urged by the appellants has been rej......
-
Ferris v. Stewart
...It is insisted that the effect of the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit in the case of Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.., v. Gillespie, 87 F.2d 944, is hold that this cannot be done, for the reason that to do so would impair the obligations of the contract under which the firs......
-
Ferris v. Stewart
...It is insisted that the effect of the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit in the case of Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Gillespie, 87 F.2d 944, is to hold that this cannot be done, for the reason that to do so would impair the obligations of the contract under which the fi......