Spande v. Western Life Indemnity Co.
Decision Date | 26 September 1911 |
Citation | 117 P. 973,61 Or. 220 |
Parties | SPANDE v. WESTERN LIFE INDEMNITY CO. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Clatsop County; J.A. Eakin, Judge.
Action by H.A. Larsen Spande against the Western Life Indemnity Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
After alleging the corporate character of the defendant and its authority to conduct the business of life insurance in the state of Oregon, the complaint recites that on August 28 1888, the Washington Co-Operative Life Insurance Association was organized and doing business within the state of Oregon as a life insurance association on a mutual benefit plan, and states "that on that date the said Washington Co-Operative Life Insurance Association, for a good and valuable consideration, executed and delivered to this plaintiff a 20-year endowment and insurance upon the life of this plaintiff, agreeing to pay plaintiff, should he live 20 years and pay his assessments, the sum of $2,000, or, if he should die before the expiration of said 20 years, to pay his beneficiary, plaintiff's wife, the sum of $2,000." According to the complaint, about September 10, 1898, the Washington association above named was reorganized under the name of the Order of Washington, and on September 20, 1904 with the consent of the plaintiff, the Order of Washington took up the original certificate of insurance issued to him by the Washington Co-Operative Life Insurance Association and instead thereof issued to him another benefit certificate of life insurance and 20-year endowment, in words and figures following, to wit:
The plaintiff avers that he complied with the rules and regulations of the original Washington association and of the Order of Washington without stating anywhere what those rules and regulations were, and that on and prior to March 21, 1908, the defendant represented to the plaintiff that the Order of Washington had entered into an agreement with the defendant, whereby the latter would take over all the insurance then being carried by the Order of Washington, and that by the payment to the defendant by the plaintiff of the monthly assessments due by the terms of the certificate issued by the order the same would be assumed by the defendant, and that the defendant "then and there, in writing, for a good and valuable consideration in hand paid by this plaintiff, covenanted, contracted, and agreed if this plaintiff would pay the said defendant all of the assessments required to be paid under the laws of the Supreme Union of the Order of Washington on said benefit certificate, life and twenty-year endowment policy hereinbefore mentioned that said defendant would assume all the conditions and stipulations contained in said insurance policy required to be done and performed by said Supreme Union of the Order of Washington."
He alleges the acceptance on his part of the contract and agreement alleged to have been made by the defendant, and that he complied with its terms, as well as with the terms of the certificate issued by the Order of Washington, until August 28, 1908, when he notified the defendant of the fact that he had lived out his life expectancy; that his policy had fully matured; and that he had in every way complied with the regulations and laws of said order and agreement between plaintiff and defendant, and demanded the payment to him by the defendant of the sum of $2,000, offering at the time to make such further proof as the defendant might require, or whatever was required by the rules, laws, or usages of the defendant, or the Order of Washington, but that the defendant waived further proof and refused payment of the sum of money mentioned. All the allegations of the complaint, except the corporate entity of defendant, were traversed by the answer.
As a further defense, the defendant alleged that the present contract made between the defendant and the Order of Washington was in words and figures as follows, the same being hereafter, for convenience, called "Exhibit A": "Reinsurance Contract between Western Life Indemnity Company and the Order of Washington. This agreement, made and entered into by and between the Western Life Indemnity Company, a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the state of Illinois, of the city of Chicago, Illinois, hereinafter designated the company, and the Order of Washington, a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the state of Oregon, of the city of Portland, Oregon, hereinafter designated the order, by J.L. Mitchell, its attorney in fact, witnesseth that:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Spande v. Western Life Indem. Co.
...SPANDE v. WESTERN LIFE INDEMNITY CO. Supreme Court of OregonMarch 19, 1912 On rehearing. Former opinion adhered to. For former opinion, see 117 P. 973. John H. Smith (John H. & A.M. Smith and Edward & Mendenhall, on the brief), for appellant. G.C. Fulton (C.W. & G.C. Fulton, on the brief), ......