Sparks v. State
| Decision Date | 23 September 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 72891,72891 |
| Citation | Sparks v. State, 349 S.E.2d 504, 180 Ga.App. 467 (Ga. App. 1986) |
| Parties | SPARKS v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Bentley C. Adams III, Thomaston, for appellant.
Johnnie L. Caldwell, Jr., Dist. Atty., Paschal A. Engish, Jr., J. David Fowler, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee.
Appellant was convicted of armed robbery, aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He appeals on several grounds, including violation of his constitutional rights through the prejudicial striking of all black jurors through the use of peremptory challenges in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).
In this case appellant made proper objection (albeit by a motion for mistrial) to removal of all black persons on the venire by the prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges. Although the State contends the motion was not timely, it was made at a motion hearing immediately following selection and empaneling of the jury, which was the first opportunity appellant had to raise the issue. Because the trial court rejected the objection without requiring the prosecutor to give an explanation for his actions, we remand the case for further proceedings pursuant to the principles enunciated in Batson v. Kentucky, supra. The trial court will determine as a matter of fact if the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Calhoun v. Purvis
...Mincey [v. State, 180 Ga.App. 263, 349 S.E.2d 1 (1986), aff'd State v. Mincey, 256 Ga. 636, 353 S.E.2d 814 (1987) ]; Sparks v. State, 180 Ga.App. 467 (349 SE2d 504) (1986) [aff'd State v. Sparks, 257 Ga. 97, 355 S.E.2d 658 (1987) ]; and Wise v. State, 179 Ga.App. 115 (346 SE2d 393) (1986). ......
-
Powell v. State
...explanation, we must remand the case for an evidentiary hearing and trial decision, as was done in Mincey, supra; Sparks v. State, 180 Ga.App. 467, 349 S.E.2d 504 (1986); and Wise v. State, 179 Ga.App. 115, 346 S.E.2d 393 (1986). One of the reasons is that the determination ordinarily must ......
-
Wright v. State
...require remand for further proceedings in this regard. See Powell, supra 182 Ga.App. at 125, 355 S.E.2d 72; Sparks v. State, 180 Ga.App. 467, 349 S.E.2d 504 (1986), aff'd State v. Sparks, supra; Wise v. State, 179 Ga.App. 115, 346 S.E.2d 393 (1986). "If the trial court decides that the fact......
-
Simpkins v. State, 73219
...including a possible claim under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Compare Sparks v. State, 180 Ga.App. 467, 349 S.E.2d 504 (1986); Mincey v. State, 180 Ga.App. 263, 349 S.E.2d 1 (1986); Wise v. State, 179 Ga.App. 115, 346 S.E.2d 393 (1986). In addition,......