Specht v. Tinsley, No. 20703

Docket NºNo. 20703
Citation153 Colo. 235, 385 P.2d 423
Case DateSeptember 30, 1963
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

Page 423

385 P.2d 423
153 Colo. 235
Francis Eddie SPECHT, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary,
Defendant in Error.
No. 20703.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
Sept. 30, 1963.

Francis Eddie Specht, pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., John E. Bush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for defendant in error.

Page 424

[153 Colo. 236] McWILLIAMS, Justice.

In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus Specht alleged that he was being 'illegally and unlawfully detained by respondent [Tinsley] at the Colorado State Penitentiary * * * in violation of his rights pursuant to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Colorado' and sought issuance of the writ on the following grounds:

1. That though convicted of the crime of indecent liberties as defined in C.R.S. '53, 40-2-32, he was thereafter improperly and unlawfully sentenced under C.R.S. '53, 39-19-1, et seq. to a term of not less than one day or more than life in the state penitentiary, rather than being sentenced pursuant to the statute under which he was convicted, viz. C.R.S. '53, 40-2-32, which states that the 'felonious assaulter' if over eighteen shall be confined in the penitentiary for a term of not more than ten years:

2. That even under C.R.S. '53, 39-19-1, et seq. the trial court was without jurisdiction to sentence him because of its alleged failure to 'arraign' him as required by C.R.S. '53, 39-19-5 (1960 Perm.Supp.);

3. That the sentence imposed is 'outside the statutory limits', inasmuch as C.R.S. '53, 39-19-1, et seq. is itself unconstitutional in that it violates:

a. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article II section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, each of which prohibits 'cruel and unusual punishment';

b. Article III of the Colorado Constitution which prohibits the legislature from delegating a legislative power to the judiciary, and the judiciary in turn from thereafter delegating the judicial power to fix and determine a sentence to the executive department, i. e. the Parole Board; and

c. The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth [153 Colo. 237] Amendment to the United States Constitution and the due process clause of the Colorado Constitution, i. e. Article II, section 26.

At the outset it should be noted that C.R.S. '53, 65-1-1 provides inter alia that '[t]he court or judge to whom the application is made shall forthwith award the writ of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 practice notes
  • People v. White, No. 80SA348
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court of Colorado
    • January 10, 1983
    ...of the public from proven dangerous sex offenders. Trueblood v. Tinsley, 148 Colo. at 507, 366 P.2d at 658; see also Specht v. Tinsley, 153 Colo. 235, 385 P.2d 423 (1963) (overruled on other grounds in Specht v. Patterson, supra). This is a legitimate legislative objective and the statute i......
  • People v. Leisen
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • July 12, 1967
    ...Supreme Court decision in Williams, 337 U.S. 241, 69 S.Ct. 1079, supra, in earlier phases of the Specht litigation (Specht v. Tinsley, 153 Colo. 235, at p. 238, 385 P.2d 423 (1963); Specht v. People of Colorado, 156 Colo. 12, 396 P.2d 838 (1964)). The Tenth Circuit relied on its earlier dec......
  • Specht v. Patterson, No. 831
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1967
    ...day to life without notice and full hearing. The Colorado Supreme Court approved the procedure, when it was challenged by habeas corpus (153 Colo. 235, 385 P.2d 423) and on motion to set aside the judgment. 156 Colo. 12, 396 P.2d 838. This federal habeas corpus proceeding resulted, the Cour......
  • Specht v. Patterson, No. 8433.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • March 23, 1966
    ...applied to this petitioner has been twice sustained in the Colorado Supreme Court, see Specht v. People, 396 P.2d 838; Specht v. Tinsley, 153 Colo. 235, 385 P.2d 423. As applied to others similarly situated, it has been sustained in Trueblood v. Tinsley, 148 Colo. 503, 366 P.2d 655; Vanderh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • People v. White, No. 80SA348
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court of Colorado
    • January 10, 1983
    ...of the public from proven dangerous sex offenders. Trueblood v. Tinsley, 148 Colo. at 507, 366 P.2d at 658; see also Specht v. Tinsley, 153 Colo. 235, 385 P.2d 423 (1963) (overruled on other grounds in Specht v. Patterson, supra). This is a legitimate legislative objective and the statute i......
  • People v. Leisen
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • July 12, 1967
    ...Supreme Court decision in Williams, 337 U.S. 241, 69 S.Ct. 1079, supra, in earlier phases of the Specht litigation (Specht v. Tinsley, 153 Colo. 235, at p. 238, 385 P.2d 423 (1963); Specht v. People of Colorado, 156 Colo. 12, 396 P.2d 838 (1964)). The Tenth Circuit relied on its earlier dec......
  • Specht v. Patterson, No. 831
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1967
    ...day to life without notice and full hearing. The Colorado Supreme Court approved the procedure, when it was challenged by habeas corpus (153 Colo. 235, 385 P.2d 423) and on motion to set aside the judgment. 156 Colo. 12, 396 P.2d 838. This federal habeas corpus proceeding resulted, the Cour......
  • Specht v. Patterson, No. 8433.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • March 23, 1966
    ...applied to this petitioner has been twice sustained in the Colorado Supreme Court, see Specht v. People, 396 P.2d 838; Specht v. Tinsley, 153 Colo. 235, 385 P.2d 423. As applied to others similarly situated, it has been sustained in Trueblood v. Tinsley, 148 Colo. 503, 366 P.2d 655; Vanderh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT