Special School Dist. No. 5 v. State

Decision Date23 June 1919
Docket Number(No. 47.)
PartiesSPECIAL SCHOOL DIST. NO. 5 OF MISSISSIPPI COUNTY et al. v. STATE et al.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Suit by the State, for the use and benefit of the Common School Fund and others, against Special School District No. 5 of Mississippi County and its directors. From decree enjoining defendants, they appeal. Affirmed.

Act 465 of the Acts of 1919, passed on the 28th of March, 1919, provided that the school district of special school district No. 5 of Mississippi county, Ark., be authorized to sell and convey by warranty deed a fee-simple title to the S. E. ¼ and E. ½ of the S. W. ¼ of section 16, township 15 north, range 11 east, Mississippi county, Ark., and to reinvest the money obtained from such sale. Section 2 of the act provided:

"That the lands may be disposed of by the directors after four weeks advertisement in the paper or papers published in Blytheville, Arkansas, for a general circulation in Mississippi county, Ark.; that the directors may dispose of the lands described in such small divisions and at public auction or private sale as they deem advisable in order to secure the best price."

Section 3 provided:

"That the funds derived from sale of the lands shall be reinvested in a building and equipment to be constructed in Blytheville, Mississippi county, Ark., and used for high school purposes."

Section 4 provided:

"That the building so constructed shall be for the benefit of children living in school districts numbers 33, 42, 49 and special school district No. 5, who may attend the school without paying tuition."

Pursuant to the authority of the act the directors caused to be published in the Herald News, a newspaper published in the city of Blytheville having a general circulation in Mississippi county, Ark., a notice of sale of the lands above described.

This suit was instituted in the name of the state, for the use and benefit of the common school fund, and by school districts Nos. 27 and 33 and by J. B. Fields, a taxpayer of school district No. 27, and Herman Cross, a taxpayer of school district No. 5 of Mississippi county, in their individual capacities, against special school district No. 5 of Mississippi county, Ark., and the directors of such district.

The plaintiffs in their complaint set up the above act, and alleged that it was void, among other things, for the reason that it violated the act of Congress granting the land in section 16 in each township of the state. They alleged that the act of Congress, granting the sixteenth sections of lands to the state, created a trust, the revenue or proceeds only from which could be used for the support of schools; that the act was a discrimination against certain of the inhabitants of the township in which the lands are located; that the act does not provide any manner for obtaining the consent of the inhabitants of such township; that the act is an attempt to take the proceeds from the sale of school lands and invest in buildings for which no sites are provided, and for obtaining which no provision is made.

The answer denied all the material allegations of the complaint as to the invalidity of the act, and alleged that the defendants did advertise, and their purpose was to proceed to sell the land in pursuance of the terms of the act, and to reinvest the proceeds in accordance with its terms.

The court found that Act 465 was unconstitutional and void, "in that it is violative of the trust imposed by the Congress upon sixteenth section lands at the time said lands were granted to the state of Arkansas, for the use of the inhabitants of the several townships for the use of the schools, in that the investment of the proceeds of the land, as outlined in the act, would be a discrimination against the inhabitants of township 15 north, range 11 east, who do not live within the boundaries of school districts Nos. 33, 42, 49, and special school district No. 5 of Mississippi county."

The court thereupon entered a decree perpetually enjoining the defendants, as directors of special school district No. 5, from selling the lands and their attempting to carry out the purposes of the act. From that decree is this appeal.

Davis, Costen & Harrison, of Blytheville, for appellants.

Jno. D. Arbuckle, Atty. Gen., and Robert C. Knox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

WOOD, J. (after stating the facts as above).

The lands in suit are part of section 16, township 15 north, range 11 east, immediately south of and adjacent to the town of Blytheville, which were granted to the state of Arkansas by the act of Congress, approved June 23, 1836 (Act June 23, 1836, c. 120, 5 Stat. 58), supplementary to the act for the admission of the state of Arkansas into the Union. The act provided:

"That section numbered sixteen in every township, and when such section has been sold or otherwise disposed of, other lands equivalent thereto, or as contiguous as may be, shall be granted to the state for the use of the inhabitants of such township for the use of schools."

By an ordinance of the Legislature approved October 18, 1836, the General Assembly of the state of Arkansas "freely accepted, ratified, and irrevocably confirmed as articles of compact and union between the state of Arkansas and the United States" the act of Congress containing the above grant of lands.

The language of the act of Congress, to wit, "for the use of the inhabitants of such townships for the use of schools," shows clearly that the purpose of the grant was to convey to the state absolute title to the sixteenth section in every township to be held in trust for the benefit of the inhabitants of the townships in which such sections are situated for the use of the schools.

Act Cong. Feb. 15, 1843, c. 33, 5 Stat. 600, conferred upon certain states, among them Arkansas, the right to provide for the sale of lands reserved and appropriated by Congress for the use of schools within those states, "and to invest the money arising from sales thereof in some productive fund, the proceeds of which shall be forever applied under the direction of said Legislatures, to the use and support of schools within the several townships and districts of country for which they were originally reserved and set apart, and for no other use or purpose whatever."

There is also other language in the act of 1843 showing that Congress interpreted the language of the original grant in the act of 1836 to mean that the money arising from the sale of the sixteenth section should be invested in some productive fund for the use and support of the schools within the townships where the sixteenth sections are situated.

While the act of Congress of 1843, supra, was declared by this court, in Mayers et al. v. Byrne et al., 19 Ark. 308, not binding upon the state as to the disposition of the land, the act nevertheless is a construction by Congress of the meaning of the terms of the original grant as to how the money derived from the sale of the sixteenth sections should be used by the state to which such lands were granted.

The Legislature as early as 1853 provided that the accruing annual interest on the money arising from the sale of the sixteenth section of land in any township shall be a perpetual fund to be appropriated to the support of a school or schools in the respective townships, but no part of the principal shall ever be expended for any purpose whatever, and shall be loaned out at an interest of not less than 8 per cent. per annum. Act Jan. 11, 1853 (Laws 1852-53, p. 143).

Section 2 of the act of 1885 (section 7488 of Kirby's...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT