Spence v. Maier, A-18.
| Citation | 61 A.2d 590 |
| Decision Date | 18 October 1948 |
| Docket Number | No. A-18.,A-18. |
| Parties | Mary SPENCE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William MAIER, Defendant, Dugan Bros. of New Jersey, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey) |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from former Supreme Court.
Action by Mary Spence against William Maier and Dugan Brothers of New Jersey, Inc., for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. From the judgment of the former Supreme Court, 137 N.J.L. 284, 59 A.2d 609, affirming an adverse judgment, the corporate defendant appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Perry E. Belfatto, of Newark, for plaintiff-respondent.
Coult & Satz and Joseph Coult, all of Newark, for defendant-appellant.
The judgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Burling in the former Supreme Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Gentile v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, A--729
...Willins v. Ludwig, 136 N.J.L. 208, 55 A.2d 48 (E. & A.1947); Spence v. Maier, 137 N.J.L. 284, 59 A.2d 609 (Sup.Ct.1948), affirmed 1 N.J. 36, 61 A.2d 590 (1948); Bacak v. Hogya, 4 N.J. 417, 73 A.2d 167 (1950). 5. Where fair-minded men might honestly differ as to the conclusions to be drawn f......
-
Sotak v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
...v. Ludwig, 136 N.J.L. 208, 55 A.2d 48 (E. & A. 1947); Spence v. Maier, 137 N.J.L. 284, 59 A.2d 609 (Sup.Ct. 1948), affirmed 1 N.J. 36, 61 A.2d 590 (1948); Bacak v. Hogya, 4 N.J. 417, 73 A.2d 167 (1950); Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated Transport, supra. In the present case we note that t......
-
Bacak v. Hogya
...men in the exercise of a fair and impartial judgment. Spence v. Maier, 137 N.J.L. 284, 59 A.2d 609 (Sup.Ct.1948), affirmed 1 N.J. 36, 61 A.2d 590 (Sup.Ct.1948); Ackerley v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 130 N.J.L. 292, 32 A.2d 449 (E. & A.1943); 38 Am.Jur. (Negligence) § 348, pp. 1052--1055. In th......
-
Scheirek v. Izsa
...a fact or by necessary exclusive inference from the proof. Spence v. Maier, 137 N.J.L. 284, 59 A.2d 609 (Sup.Ct.1948), affirmed, 1 N.J. 36, 61 A.2d 590 (1948); Bacak v. Hogya, 4 N.J. 417, 73 A.2d 167 And so, the existence either of contributory negligence or of its twin, assumption of risk,......
Request a trial to view additional results