Spence v. North Carolina Ellison v. Texas Jackson v. Beto, 759

Decision Date01 October 1967
Docket NumberNo. 759,No. 1311,No. 1823,M,759,1311,1823
Citation392 U.S. 649,88 S.Ct. 2290,20 L.Ed.2d 1350
PartiesJoseph Eugene SPENCE et al. v. NORTH CAROLINA. isc. Jessie ELLISON v. TEXAS. isc. Robert Eddie Louis JACKSON v. George J. BETO, Corrections Director. isc
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Sam Houston Clinton, Jr., for petitioner Jessie Ellison.

T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen. of North Carolina, and Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent State of North Carolina.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Hawthorne Phillips and Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Attys. Gen., and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for respondent State of Texas.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert C. Flowers, Douglas H. Chilton, and Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent George J. Beto.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

For opinion on remand see 164 S.E.2d 593.

PER CURIAM.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the courts below are vacated and the cases remanded for reconsideration in the light of Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776.

Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice HARLAN dissent for reasons stated in Mr. Justice Black's dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 532, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 1782, 20 L.Ed.2d 776.

Mr. Justice WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 540, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 1786, 20 L.Ed.2d 776.

To continue reading

Request your trial
32 cases
  • State v. Sanders
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 12 Junio 1970
    ...pursuant to a verdict of guilty. State v. Atkinson, supra; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23, 155 S.E.2d 802, vacated 392 U.S. 649, 88 S.Ct. 2290, 20 L.Ed.2d 1350 (1968); State v. Bumpers (first hearing), 270 N.C. 521, 155 S.E.2d 173, rev'd 391 U.S. 543, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968); Sta......
  • O'Bryan v. Estelle
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 26 Agosto 1983
    ...reversed this case, Jackson v. Beto, and remanded it to the Fifth Circuit "for reconsideration in light of Witherspoon " (392 U.S. 649, 88 S.Ct. 2290, 20 L.Ed.2d 1350). 24 "The record is silent as to who was responsible for misplacing it, but petitioner-appellant does not charge that it occ......
  • State v. Silhan
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 4 Marzo 1981
    ...Cameron, 283 N.C. 191, 195 S.E.2d 481 (1973); State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23, 155 S.E.2d 802 (1967), death sentence vacated, 392 U.S. 649, 88 S.Ct. 2290, 20 L.Ed.2d 1350, on remand, 274 N.C. 536, 164 S.E.2d 593 (1968). In McLaughlin, we found no error in the trial court's denial of a bill of ......
  • Bean v. State
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 3 Febrero 1970
    ...remanded cases because of prejudicial jury selection violative of Witherspoon. Boulden v. Holman, supra; Spence v. North Carolina, 392 U.S. 649, 88 S.Ct. 2290, 20 L.Ed.2d 1350, on remand, 274 N.C. 536, 164 S.E.2d 593 5. The thesis of Witherspoon is whether the totality of the trial court's ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT