Spence v. State
| Docket Number | S-18-0035 |
| Decision Date | 16 May 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
Byerly v. State
...the credibility of Ms. Pickerill’s claims of pain, it was not vouching testimony. See Spence v. State , 2019 WY 51, ¶ 14, 441 P.3d 271, 275 (Wyo. 2019) (noting that "incidental bolstering of the victim’s credibility alone does not make the expert testimony [on abuse] improper," so long as e......
-
Mitchell v. State
...of foundation and relevancy, competency, materiality, and remoteness of the evidence." Spence v. State , 2019 WY 51, ¶ 42, 441 P.3d 271, 282 (Wyo. 2019) (quoting Overson v. State , 2017 WY 4, ¶ 26, 386 P.3d 1149, 1154 (Wyo. 2017) ). We will not disturb the trial court's determination of the......
-
Klingbeil v. State
...of foundation and relevancy, competency, materiality, and remoteness of the evidence." Spence v. State , 2019 WY 51, ¶ 42, 441 P.3d 271, 282 (Wyo. 2019) (quoting Overson v. State , 2017 WY 4, ¶ 26, 386 P.3d 1149, 1154 (Wyo. 2017) ). We will not disturb the trial court's determination of the......
-
N. Arapaho Tribe v. Baldwin, Crocker & Rudd, P.C.
...the outcome would have been more favorable to the party opposing the evidence." Id. (citing Spence v. State , 2019 WY 51, ¶ 11, 441 P.3d 271, 274 (Wyo. 2019) ; Klingbeil v. State , 2021 WY 89, ¶ 32, 492 P.3d 279, 286 (Wyo. 2021) ).A. References to Race[¶44] The first reference to race occur......
Get Started for Free