Spencer's Estate, In re
Decision Date | 29 August 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 2--57068,2--57068 |
Citation | 232 N.W.2d 491 |
Parties | In the Matter of the ESTATE of L. J. SPENCER, Deceased. In the Matter of the ESTATE of Fern E. SPENCER, Deceased. Appeal of Harold SPENCER, Executor of the Estate of L. J. Spencer, Deceased, and Eugene R. Melson, guardian ad litem for the minor grandchildren of L. J. Spencer and Fern E. Spencer. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Cudahy, Wilcox, Handley & Magee, Jefferson, and Dickinson, Throckmorton, Parker, Mannheimer & Raife, Des Moines, for appellant, Harold Spencer, Executor of the Estate of L. J. Spencer, deceased.
E. R. Melson, Jefferson, guardian ad litem for minor grandchildren of L. J. Spencer and Fern E. Spencer.
William C. Ostlund, Jefferson, guardian ad litem for great grandchildren of L. J. Spencer and Fern E. Spencer.
Kurth & Bunger, Carroll, for appellee Lyle Spencer, Trustee of the trust established under the will of Fern E. Spencer.
Heard before MOORE, C.J., and MASON, RAWLINGS, LeGRAND and McCORMICK, JJ.
This appeal involves the construction of trust provisions established under the will of Fern E. Spencer, deceased, and the related exercise of a power of appointment which she granted to her husband, L. J. Spencer. The trial court found the purported exercise of the power of appointment by L. J. Spencer in his last will and testament was invalid. In the absence of either a gift over or a residuary clause in Fern E. Spencer's will, the trial court decreed the trust property reverted to her estate to be disposed of as intestate property. The executor of the L. J. Spencer estate and the guardian ad litem for the minor grandchildren of L. J. Spencer and Fern E. Spencer appeal. The guardian ad litem for the grandchildren did not file timely notice of appeal, and this proceeding must be dismissed as to him.
No oral evidence was offered. The case was submitted below, and is determinable here, on the wills of Fern E. Spencer and L. J. Spencer, together with the files in both estates, which were introduced into evidence by agreement.
The factual background of this family dispute is as follows: L. J. Spencer (hereafter referred to as L. J.) and Fern E. Spencer (hereafter referred to as Fern), husband and wife, between them owned a section of land in Greene County, L. J. owned 480 acres, and Fern owned the remaining 160-acre quarter-section.
Fern died in 1944. By her will she left her real estate (the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 85 North, Range 31 West of the 5th P.M. Greene County) in trust for the benefit of her four children--Donna Ilene Spencer, Lyle Darwin Spencer, Dale Eldon Spencer and Harold L. Spencer. She designated L. J. as trustee with power to dispose of the real estate by will or deed by granting a life estate to the four children heretofore named, the remainder to go to their children (her grandchildren). This power was to be exercised when L. J. made an 'equitable' distribution of his own 480 acres in the same manner as provided for Fern's land. If any child of L. J. and Fern died without children, the share of such child went to his or her surviving brothers and sister.
The pertinent provisions in the Fern Spencer will, paragraphs three and four, are here set out:
'Three. I hereby nominate and constitute my beloved husband L. J. Spencer, as Trustee, without bond, of the following described real estate owned by me, towit:
The Northeast Quarter (N.E. 1/4) of section Four (4) in Township Eighty-Five (85) North, Range Thirty-One (31) West 5th P.M. Iowa.
and authorize and direct my said Trustee to take charge of said real estate on March 1, 1945, and to rent and manage the same during his lifetime or until such time as he makes distribution of his individual property, among his children, as hereinafter provided such rents * * * to be paid to my said children, Harold Lee Spencer, Donna Ilene Spencer, Lyle Darwin Spencer and Dale Eldon Spencer, in equal shares, at such time and under such conditions as said Trustee deems proper. Each of said four children to share equalily in the income thereof. * * *
L. J. survived his wife by twenty-eight years. He died in 1972 without having exercised by deed the power of appointment Fern had conferred upon him. He was survived by all four of the children heretofore named, by thirteen grandchildren, and by one great grandchild.
L. J.'s will, a long and minutely detailed instrument, included the following provisions:
'* * *
'* * *
'* * *
'(e) Any sums remaining on hand after the establishment of the working balance, as hereinbefore provided, * * * shall be divided by the trustee into four equal shares to be held by the trustee for the use and benefit of each of my children during their lifetime.
'* * *
The trial court found the purported exercise of the power of appointment by use of a trust, instead of an outright life estate, violated the terms of the power and was therefore invalid. In its decree the trial court said:
'* * *
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kalouse's Estate, Matter of
...to only if the will is clearly ambiguous, conflicting, or testator's intent is for any reason uncertain. See e. g., In re Estate of Spencer, 232 N.W.2d 491, 495 (Iowa 1975). Article V left the residue of Kalouse's property to "first cousins on both my father's and mother's side of my family......
-
Youngblut v. Youngblut
...41 N.W.2d 86, 93 (1950) ; In re Cocklin's Estate , 236 Iowa 98, 111–12, 17 N.W.2d 129, 135–36 (1945) ; see also In re Estate of Spencer , 232 N.W.2d 491, 499 (Iowa 1975).2 To ensure that this burden of proof is not diluted, a jury hearing both a will contest and a tortious-interference-with......
-
Loring v. Karri-Davies
...Co. v. Foulke, 28 Del.Ch. 238, 40 A.2d 713 (1945); Phipps v. Palm Beach Trust Co., 142 Fla. 782, 196 So. 299 (1970); In re Estate of Spencer, 232 N.W.2d 491 (Iowa 1975); National State Bank v. Morrison, 9 N.J.Super. 552, 75 A.2d 916 (Ch. 1950). Here we note once again that in some of the ca......
-
Little v. Davis
...is not the business of the courts to interfere with the disposition an aged person makes of her property."); see also In re Spencer's Est. , 232 N.W.2d 491, 497 (Iowa 1975) (stating courts are "bound to carry out" the intent of a settlor or testator); In re Butler's Tr. , 261 Iowa 445, 154 ......