Spengler v. Williams

Citation67 Miss. 1,6 So. 613
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
Decision Date28 October 1889
PartiesELIZABETH SPENGLER, ADMR., v. CATHERINE WILLIAMS

FROM the circuit court of Warren county, HON. RALPH NORTH, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion. The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for $ 1000, and, after motion for a new trial was overruled, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

Dabney McCabe & Anderson, for appellant.

There was a total lack of evidence to show that the lumber pile was an object of attraction to children, and that Spengler knew it. It was necessary to prove these things. It was necessary to aver them in the declaration, and being averred there must be proof to sustain them. There cannot be any presumption that children would play about the pile, and that Spengler knew this.

The proof shows that the street was an unfrequented one terminating in a deep hollow, and being so little used there was no negligence in leaving lumber piled in it. Surely the court cannot say that a bare pile of lumber in such a place possesses such qualities, and to that extent that it was unnecessary to have some proof that it was attractive to children, and that Spengler was aware of this. Plaintiff failed to make out the case, and the verdict should have been set aside.

R. V Booth, for appellee.

How could it be proved that the lumber pile was attractive to children, and that Spengler knew it? That it was attractive to them is shown by the fact that four little boys were playing around it when the child was killed, and one of defendant's witnesses had previously seen eight or ten boys playing on it. That Spengler knew this is to be deduced from the common knowledge and experience of mankind. We know from observation and experience the habits, customs, instincts, and tastes of children, and we understand that anything out of the usual order of things is calculated to entice and fascinate them.

OPINION

COOPER, J.

This is an action by appellee to recover against the estate of S Spengler damages for the death of her son caused by the negligence of said Spengler. The declaration avers that Spengler negligently and carelessly piled a large lot of lumber in the public street in an unsafe and dangerous manner; that her son, a child of seven years, and other children in the vicinity were accustomed to play in and about said streets, and on the day of October, while they were so playing around said lumber, by reason of the careless and negligent manner in which it had been piled, it fell upon and killed her said son. There is an averment in the declaration that "the said Spengler well knew that the piling of timber in heaps in said street was well calculated to attract and entice children of tender age to play above and around it, yet notwithstanding this he kept said timber piled in its irregular and dangerous condition for a long period of time, and until the death of her...

To continue reading

Request your trial
32 cases
  • Hughes v. Star Homes, Inc.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 16, 1980
    ... ... STAR HOMES, INC. and David Pritchett ... No. 51152 ... Supreme Court of Mississippi ... Jan. 16, 1980 ...         Williams, Glover & Walton, Ronnie L. Walton, H. Wingfield Glover, Jr., Meridian, for appellant ...         Snow, Covington, Temple & Watts, Arlo ...         The minority relies on Spengler, Admr. v. Williams, 67 Miss. 1, 6 So. 613 (1889). Spengler has no application because the lumber was not piled on defendant's property but in a ... ...
  • Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Tripp
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 10, 1938
    ... ... Elder, ... 118 Miss. 856, 80 So. 334; Universal Truck Loading Co. v ... Taylor, 174 Miss. 353, 164 So. 3; Beard v ... Williams, 172 Miss. 880, 161 So. 750; Shelton v ... Underwood, 174 Miss. 169, 163 So. 828; Spengler v ... Williams, 67 Miss. 1; Fogler v. Pittsburg ... ...
  • Lucas v. Hammond
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 9, 1928
    ...The evidence showed an invitation. Counsel refer to the Mississippi cases of McKey v. Vicksburg, 64 Miss. 777, 2 So. 178; Spengler v. Williams, 67 Miss. 1, 6 So. 613; Temple v. McComb City, 89 Miss. 1, 42 So. Vicksburg v. McLain, 67 Miss. 4, 6 So. 774, and Dampf v. Y. & M. V. R. R. Co., 95 ......
  • Salt River Valley Water Users' Association v. Compton ex rel. Compton
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • June 1, 1932
    ... ... Co., 89 Miss. 1, 10 Ann. Cas. 924, 119 Am. St. Rep. 698, ... 11 L.R.A. (N.S.) 449, 42 So. 874; also Spendler v ... Williams, 67 Miss. 1, 6 So. 613. This alone, as I ... view it, justified the jury in concluding that the poles as ... maintained were likely to be climbed ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT