Spinelli v. Spinelli

Decision Date30 April 1990
CitationSpinelli v. Spinelli, 554 N.Y.S.2d 713, 160 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
PartiesLinda SPINELLI, Respondent, v. Stephen SPINELLI, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Burton G. Rudnick, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Ann C. O'Halloran, Staten Island, for respondent.

Before THOMPSON, J.P., and BROWN, KUNZEMAN and HARWOOD, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated February 3, 1989, as awarded the plaintiff wife a judgment of divorce upon the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, after a nonjury trial.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We are satisfied that the plaintiff sufficiently demonstrated "a course of conduct by the defendant spouse which is harmful to the physical or mental health of the plaintiff and makes cohabitation unsafe or improper" (Brady v. Brady, 64 N.Y.2d 339, 343, 486 N.Y.S.2d 891, 476 N.E.2d 290). Furthermore, we discern no basis for disturbing the court's finding of cruel and inhuman treatment on the part of the defendant as against the weight of the evidence. The plaintiff's trial testimony contained a recitation of several incidents during which the defendant physically and verbally abused her. At trial the husband denied these incidents ever took place. He also attempted to show that the plaintiff had other motives for seeking the divorce and had "manufactured" her allegations of spousal mistreatment. However, the trial court found the plaintiff's testimony more credible and credited her version of the events over the evidence adduced by the defendant. Accordingly, giving due deference to the trial court's assessment, inter alia, of the credibility of the witnesses, ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Reiss v. Reiss
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 19, 1991
    ...and improper (see, Domestic Relations Law § 170[1]; Brady v. Brady, 64 N.Y.2d 339, 486 N.Y.S.2d 891, 476 N.E.2d 290; Spinelli v. Spinelli, 160 A.D.2d 992, 554 N.Y.S.2d 713; Rieger v. Rieger, 161 A.D.2d 227, 554 N.Y.S.2d 613; McKilligan v. McKilligan, 156 A.D.2d 904, 550 N.Y.S.2d 121; Weiler......
  • Dunne v. Dunne
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 1, 1991
    ...trial court as factfinder on the issue of cruel and inhuman treatment will not be lightly disturbed on appeal (see, Spinelli v. Spinelli, 160 A.D.2d 992, 554 N.Y.S.2d 713; see also, Rieger v. Rieger, 161 A.D.2d 227, 554 N.Y.S.2d 613; Rispoli v. Rispoli, 131 A.D.2d 556, 557, 516 N.Y.S.2d 280......
  • Rheinheimer v. Rheinheimer
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 16, 1997
    ...including verbal and physical abuse, which was harmful to plaintiff's well-being and made cohabitation unsafe (see, Spinelli v. Spinelli, 160 A.D.2d 992, 554 N.Y.S.2d 713; Rispoli v. Rispoli, 131 A.D.2d 556, 516 N.Y.S.2d 280, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 609, 522 N.Y.S.2d 109, 516 N.E.2d 1222). Defe......
  • Zack v. Zack
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 18, 1992
    ...or improper for the plaintiff to cohabit with the defendant" (Domestic Relations Law § 170[1]; Dunne v. Dunne, supra; Spinelli v. Spinelli, 160 A.D.2d 992, 554 N.Y.S.2d 713). Accordingly, the judgment should be Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. ...
  • Get Started for Free