Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 13–1339.
| Decision Date | 05 October 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. 13–1339.,13–1339. |
| Citation | Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S.Ct. 289(Mem), 193 L.Ed.2d 17(Mem) (2015) |
| Parties | SPOKEO, INC., petitioner, v. Thomas ROBINS. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
136 S.Ct. 289 (Mem)
193 L.Ed.2d 17
SPOKEO, INC., petitioner,
v.
Thomas ROBINS.
No. 13–1339.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 5, 2015.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
22 cases
-
Vigil v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency
...“in a personal and individual way,” when they each received personally-directed communications from FEMA and NRCS staff. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robbins, 136 S.Ct. at 339. Plaintiff, therefore, demonstrates a “‘personal stake' in the outcome of litigation . . . sufficient to show particularity.” Ka......
-
Curry v. Palmetto Sur. Corp.
...doctrine of standing “limits the category of litigants empowered to maintain a lawsuit in federal court to seek redress for a legal wrong.” Id. As opposed to a rule intended to keep aggrieved parties out of court” or a “test of substantive rights[,]” standing is “designed to ensure that cou......
-
DFS Guam L.P. v. A.B. Won Pat Int'l Airport Auth. (In re A.B. Won Pat Int'l Airport Auth.), (2019)
...requirements by statutorily granting the right to sue to a plaintiff who would not otherwise have standing.'" Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, -- U.S. --, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547-48 (2016) (alteration in original) (quoting Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811, 820 n.3 (1997)); Summers v. Earth Island Inst., 5......
-
Hemlani v. Melwani, (2020)
...protected interest' that is 'concrete and particularized' and 'actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.'" Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547 (2016) (quoting Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992)). Traceability is a causation requirement. See Bennett v. ......
Get Started for Free