Sponduris v. Rameih

Citation199 S.E. 457
Decision Date01 November 1938
Docket NumberNo. 8748.,8748.
CourtSupreme Court of West Virginia
PartiesSPONDURIS. v. RAMEIH.

199 S.E. 457

SPONDURIS.
v.
RAMEIH.

No. 8748.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Nov. 1, 1938.


Syllabus by the Court.

1. Under Code, 56-7-10, providing for the reference of law actions to commissioners, the testimony taken before a commissioner cannot be excluded in a jury trial for that reason, and, if before the jury, may be considered by it as sufficient to overcome the commissioner's findings to which it relates.

2. A judgment notwithstanding the verdict cannot be based upon the trial court's finding of fact.

Error to Circuit Court, Raleigh County.

Action in assumpsit by Bertha Sponduris against S. M. Rameih. To review a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant brings error.

Judgment reversed, and judgment entered for defendant.

Ashworth & Sanders, of Beckley, for plaintiff in error.

W. A. Thornhill, Jr., of Beckley, and W. W. Goldsmith, of Charleston, for defendant in error.

KENNA, Judge.

This is an action in assumpsit brought in the Circuit Court of Raleigh County by Bertha Sponduris against S. M. Rameih. The declaration, which included only the common counts, was filed at September Rules, 1933, the amount sought to be recovered being nineteen hundred sixty-three dollars. An account was filed with the declaration, which, including interest brought the amount alleged to be due the plaintiff to two thousand four hundred thirty-nine dollars and forty-eight cents. On October 12, 1934, an order was entered referring the action to one of the commissioners in chancery for the purpose of having him "take, state and report" an account between the plaintiff and the defendant, the order containing a recital that the matters involved are such that "an account should be stated between the parties." The reference was upon motion of the defendant, the granting of which was resisted by the plaintiff. The commissioner's report was filed October 10, 1935, finding for the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand two hundred twenty-eight dollars and sixty-nine cents, to which finding and report the defendant had, before the commissioner, filed exceptions.

On March 20, 1936, the defendant pleaded non-assumpsit and demanded a jury trial, whereupon the case was presented to the jury and a verdict was rendered, the form of which was that the jury found the defendant "does not owe the plaintiff Bertha Sponduris anything" and the plaintiff "owes the defendant nothing." Based upon these specific findings the general verdict was for the defendant. The plaintiff moved the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT