Sponge Exch. Bank of Tarpon Springs v. Commercial Credit Co.
Decision Date | 14 February 1920 |
Docket Number | 3389. |
Parties | SPONGE EXCH. BANK OF TARPON SPRINGS v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT CO. [1] |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
James F. Glen and K. I. McKay, both of Tampa, Fla. (McKay & Withers, of Tampa, Fla., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
N. B K. Pettinghill and M. B. Macfarlane, both of Tampa, Fla. (R E. L. Chancey, of Tampa, Fla., on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before WALKER, Circuit Judge, and GRUBB and JACK, District Judges.
This was an action by the defendant in error, Commercial Credit Company, a Delaware corporation (herein referred to as the Credit Company), against the plaintiff in error, the Sponge Exchange Bank, a Florida banking corporation (herein referred to as the Bank), as the indorser of 13 promissory notes made to and indorsed by the United Divers' Supply Company (herein referred to as the Supply Company). The Bank pleaded, first, payment; and, second, a plea to the effect that it was never the owner of the notes sued on, and that its president indorsed them in its name solely for the purpose of lending its credit to said notes, which was well known to the Credit Company when it acquired the same. The Bank assigns as errors sundry rulings made by giving and refusing instructions to the jury, including the action of the court in overruling the Bank's motion, made at the conclusion of the evidence, to direct a verdict in its favor.
The notes sued on were acquired by the Credit Company in the course of dealings which commenced in pursuance of the terms of the following letter of its vice president:
Wm. H. Grimes, Vice President.'
After the Credit Company had so acquired several notes given to the Supply Company and indorsed by it and the Bank, the latter not giving a surety bond under the option stated in a paragraph of the letter, the following written agreement was entered into:
second party, and will pay therefor one hundred per cent. (100%) of the face of said notes, of which 77% shall be paid in cash upon acceptance thereof by second party, and the remaining 23%, less any deductions and plus any overpayments by the debtors, and less charges hereinafter mentioned to be paid to said first party immediately upon payment of any such note to second party: Provided that no payments of any such remainder shall be made so long as any note purchased hereunder is due and unpaid.
'The total compensation to be paid by first party, it is agreed shall be one-thirtieth of 1 per cent. of the face of said notes for each day from date of purchase by and until paid to second party, plus $5 per $1,000 only on the first $100,000 of notes purchased within any 12 successive months' period. Said $5 per $1,000 will be refunded to first party as soon as $100,000 or more of notes have been purchased hereunder within any 12 successive months' period.
'In witness whereof, first party has caused these presents to be executed this 8th day of May, 1916.
The following resolution was adopted by the board of directors of the Bank at a regular meeting on May 2, 1916, a copy of which was sent by the Bank to the Credit Company:
Supply Co. are to take notes from the captains or owners of the vessels for money and provisions advanced them. The United Divers' Supply Co. to indorse said notes to the Sponge Exchange Bank, for an advance of 77 per cent. of their face value, up to the amount not to exceed $30,000.00, and the bank to indorse them to the Commercial Credit Co. of Baltimore, who will reimburse them. The $30,000.00 to be used by the United Divers' Supply Co. to pay all loans now outstanding and to discount bills. Said advances made by this bank to be covered by marine insurance. Every vessel is to settle its note at the end of the current trip, and the United Divers' Supply Co. is to make up any and all shortages that may arise from a poor trip.
The following written agreement was entered into between the Bank and the Supply Company on May 10, 1916, and duly signed:
Supply Co. agrees to take notes for provisions and cash furnished the sponge boats which they operate, said notes to be signed by the actual owner of the vessel, if possible; if not by the owner, by the captain in charge of the vessel. Attached to each note shall be a bill of the merchandise and cash furnished the vessel, and insurance policy covering such merchandise and cash advance.
Supply Co. agrees to make up the shortage. It is understood and agreed that these notes must be paid each trip before any further advances will be made.
Supply Co., and indorse them to the Commercial Credit Co. of Baltimore, who will advance 77 per cent....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Missouri Finance Corp. v. Roos
... ... v ... Hunter, 113 Mo.App. 671; Citizens Bank v ... Evans, 176 Mo.App. 704; Schuster v ... 309, and 210 F. 893; National Trust & Credit Co. v. F. H. Orcutt & Son Co., 259 F. 830; ... Bierley v. Commercial Credit Co., 43 F.2d 724, 730; ... In re Gotham ... v ... Thompson, 278 F. 597; Sponge Exchange Bank v ... Commercial Credit Co., 263 ... ...
-
Wallace Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank of Fairfield
... ... v. Irvin, 51 N.Y. 51; Sponge Exchange Bank v. Commercial ... Credit Co., 263 ... ...
-
McCornick & Company v. Citizens Bank of Hutchinson
... ... Kansas state bank has no power to lend its credit by ... guaranteeing obligations of another ... v. Loan ... Co., 63 Kan. 359; Sponge Exchange Bank v. Commercial ... Credit Co., 263 ... ...
-
Ferguson v. Five Points Nat. Bank of Miami
...is not permitted to lend its credit in transactions where it has no beneficial interest. 1 In Sponge Exchange Bank of Tarpon Springs v. Commercial Credit Corporation, 5th Cir.1920, 263 F. 20, the Court of Appeals 'The law under which the Bank exists does not permit it to lend its credit to ......