Spotswood v. Morris, 12 Idaho 360 (Idaho 6/13/1906)
Decision Date | 13 June 1906 |
Citation | 85 Pac. 1094,12 Idaho 360 |
Parties | A. T. SPOTSWOOD et al., Respondents, v. J. B. MORRIS, as Administrator, et al., Appellants. |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
(Syllabus by the court.)
APPEAL from the District Court of the Second Judicial District for Nez Perce County. Hon. Edgar C. Steele, Judge.
Action to recover commissions for procuring a purchaser for an alleged sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiffs. Reversed.
James E. Babb and Daniel Needham, for Appellants.
I. N. Smith, for Respondents.
This is an action to recover $2,350, and interest for commission as real estate brokers, for the sale of certain land situated in Idaho county. The sufficiency of the complaint was sustained by this court on a former appeal (10 Idaho, 129, 77 Pac. 216). After filing the remittitur in the court below, the administrator and administratrix of the Benjamin F. Morris estate answered, as did also the defendants, John P. Vollmer and Robert Schleicher. The other defendants were not served with summons and did not appear in the action.
It is alleged, among other things, in the complaint, that the appellants were copartners engaged in general real estate brokerage and commission business at the town of Moscow, Latah county, and were engaged, among other things, in procuring purchasers for lands belonging to third persons, and buying and selling real estate for others; that Benjamin F. Morris was a resident and inhabitant of Lewiston, Idaho, and that on the fourth day of June, 1902, he died intestate, leaving surviving him certain heirs, and that the said J. B. Morris and Harry F. Morris were duly appointed administrator and administratrix of the estate of said deceased; that during the lifetime of said Morris, in the year 1895, he and the defendants, Dernham, Kauffman, Vollmer, Schleicher and Scott, associated themselves together by an instrument in writing dated September 18, 1895, in a syndicate to purchase of and from said Morris, now deceased, certain real estate, describing it, consisting of 2,720.80 acres of land, situated in Idaho county, for the purpose of reselling the same and dividing the profits thereof, in which syndicate each of said persons, except said Morris, deceased, acquired and was the owner of and entitled to a one-eighth part of said land and the profits thereof, and that said Morris, deceased, acquired in said association a three-eighths interest and was entitled to three-eighths of the profits thereof; that by said article of agreement the said Morris, now deceased, was required to, and did, deed in trust for said syndicate said lands to the said Robert Schleicher, and that by the terms of said articles to facilitate the accomplishment and purpose of said syndicate, the said Schleicher was appointed secretary of said association under the following agreement, which was signed by each of said defendants:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
West Side Oil Co. v. McDorman
...or managing officers. Authorities supra; Willis v. Greiner (Tex. Civ. App.) 26 S. W. 858; Spotswood v. Morris, 12 Idaho, 360, 85 Pac. 1094, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 665, at page 674. It would seem under the articles of association a majority of the trustees could enter into an enforceable contrac......
-
The State ex rel. Great American Home Savings Institution v. Lee
...as have for many generations been held and possessed by individuals under and by virtue of their common law right of contract. Spottswood v. Morris, 12 Idaho 360; Hotel Company v. Jones, 177 U.S. 449; Warner & Ray v. Beers, 23 Wend. 101; King v. Webb, East. 406; 4 Cyc. 304; Hammerstein v. P......
-
State v. Lee
...of corporations." 177 U. S. loc. cit. 456, 20 Sup. Ct. 693, 44 L. Ed. 842. This contention was made in Spottswood v. Morris, 12 Idaho, 360, 85 Pac. 1094, 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 665, and the section of the Idaho Constitution identical with section 11, supra, was cited. In disposing of the point ......
-
Victor Refining Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Commerce
...passed laws restraining the formation of joint-stock companies. See Phillips v. Blatchford, 137 Mass. 512; Spotswood v. Morris, 12 Idaho, 360, 85 Pac. 1094, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 665 and note. While the laws of this state do not make such associations illegal, we have laws which, to some exten......