Springer Land Ass v. Ford
Decision Date | 13 December 1897 |
Docket Number | No. 89,89 |
Citation | 18 S.Ct. 170,42 L.Ed. 562,168 U.S. 513 |
Parties | SPRINGER LAND ASS'N et al. v. FORD |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
[Syllabus from pages 513-515 intentionally omitted] This was a bill filed by Patrick P. Ford against the Springer Land Association and others, in the district court of New Mexico for the county of Colfax, to foreclose a mechanic's lien upon an irrigating ditch and reservoir system, the land covered thereby, the right of way therefor, and the particular lands intended to be irrigated. A cross bill was filed by the Springer Land Association and other defendants. The cause was heard on pleadings and proofs, and, on findings of fact and conclusions of law duly made and filed, the district court entered a decree in favor of Ford, adjudging a lien for the sum of $22,097.75, with interest and costs, on the ditch and reservoirs in question, together with the right of way (, and also on 22,000 acres of land appurtenant to the ditch, and to be irrigated thereby, specifying 46 describing them)sections in four designated townships.
It was further decreed that the Springer Land Association and other defendants pay or cause to be paid the sum found due, with interest and costs ($3,000 thereof to be paid to the clerk of the court), within 90 days, and in case of default that the property be sold by a special master, and the proceeds distributed as prescribed; $3,000 to be retained by the clerk of the court to await the determination of a suit by Dargle, a subcontractor, to recover the amount of $2,279.30, with interest and costs, or its payment and discharge by Ford. If a surplus was realized t the sale, it was to be held subject to the further order of the court. If a deficiency resulted, the amount was to be reported by the master to the court.
The case was carried to the supreme court of the territory, which found the facts, in substance, to be these:
On October 26, 1888, the Springer Land Association entered into a contract with Patrick P. Ford for the grading work in the construction of a certain ditch line and reservoir system for irrigation in Colfax county, N. M., which contract, and the specifications forming part of it, were set forth at length.
The contract provided:
Specification 11 related to allowance for extra work when done under the orders of the engineer.
Specifications 13 and 15 were:
This contract was set forth in extenso.
'Five days subsequent to the making of his grading contract, complainant, Ford, entered into another contract with the Springer Land Association, by which he agreed to select and accept one section of land under the proposed ditch system at the stipulated price of eight thousand dollars, to be taken as part payment on the contract price for Ford's grading work, by way of deduction of that sum from the final estimates on the contract for the construction of said ditch.
'Ford let subcontracts for portions of the work to McGarvey, Dargle, and Haynes.'
That with Dargle was given in full, and the three were of like form and tenor, and approved by the engineer. Each contained this clause: 'It is mutually agreed that the amounts of these subestimates will in no case be demanded or paid in advance of the payment of the regular estimate.'
Estimates, as provided by the contract of October 26, 1888, were made by the supervising engineer from time to time, which were audited and paid by the Springer Land Association up to about May, 1889.
Estimate No. 6 was dated April 30, 1889, and showed the amount then due and payable, after reserving 10 per cent., to be $5,010.92. The amount of this estimate has never been paid.
June 13, 1889, the engineer gave Ford a written acceptance of the work, and a final estimate, set forth at large in the findings. The total amount payable under the contract was $48,553.56. The six prior estimates aggregated $35,928.03, and the last and final estimate was for $12,625.53; but as the sixth estimate, of $5,010.92, had not been paid, the total amount due was $17,636.45.
'This amount the Springer Land Association refused to audit any pay, on the ground that the sum so stated was in excess of the amount due; that the work had not been completed according to contract; that the engineer's final estimate was erroneous, either through fraud, inadvertence, or mistake, because the subcontractors had not been paid the several sums due them on the work by Ford, and that the property was not free from danger from liens; and also that Ford should accept the section of land which he had agreed to accept, and which he had previously selected, in payment of $8,000 of the amount of such final estimate.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nelson Bennett Co. v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.
... ... 327; 20 Am. & ... Eng. Ency. of Law, 2d ed., 297; 2 Jones on Liens, sec. 1257; ... Phillips on Mechanics' Liens, sec. 188.) ... Springer ... Land Assn. v. Ford, 168 U.S. 513, 18 S.Ct. 170, 42 ... L.Ed. 562, holds in substance: That a mechanic's lien law ... creates a lien not only ... ...
-
Furr's Supermarkets v. Richardson & Richardson
...Heating Co. v. Wallace, 38 N.M. 3, 27 P.2d 984 (1933); Ford v. Springer Land Ass'n, 8 N.M. 37, 41 P. 541 (1895), aff'd, 168 U.S. 513, 18 S.Ct. 170, 42 L.Ed. 562 (1897) ("The Courts of New Mexico are committed to the doctrine that `the mechanic's lien law is remedial in its nature and equita......
-
Cubit Corp. v. Hausler
...public policy behind our lien law as announced in Ford v. Springer Land Ass'n, 8 N.M. 37, 41 P. 541 (1895), aff'd, 168 U.S. 513, 18 S.Ct. 170, 42 L.Ed. 562 (1897) (quoted with approval in Dysart, 44 N.M. at 356, 102 P.2d at 667). Justice Laughlin, writing for the Ford court, stated that a l......
-
Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. North Platte Valley Irr. Co.
... ... or machinery for any building, erection or improvement upon ... land, or for repairing the same, under or by virtue of any ... contract with the owner or proprietor ... 443, 25 L.Ed. 1057; Canal ... Co. v. Gordon, 6 Wall. 561, 18 L.Ed. 894; Springer ... Land Association v. Ford, 168 U.S. 513, 18 Sup.Ct. 170, ... 42 L.Ed. 562; State Bank of ... ...
-
The Construction Industry in the U.S. Supreme Court:Part 2, Beyond Contract Law
...statute). See also Meyer v. Hornby, 101 U.S. 728 (1879) (following the holding in Brooks , 101 U.S. 443). 44. Springer Land Ass’n v. Ford, 168 U.S. 513 (1897). 45. See, e.g. , Kneeland v. Luce, 141 U.S. 491 (1891); Wright v. Ky. & Great E. Ry. Co., 117 U.S. 72 (1886). 46. See James W. ely J......