Spurling v. Kansas State Park and Resources Authority

Decision Date13 November 1981
Docket NumberNo. 52308,52308
Citation636 P.2d 182,6 Kan.App.2d 803
PartiesWalter SPURLING, Steve Bever and Johna Bever, Conrad Livingston and Mary Livingston, Jack Harrigan and Madaline Harrigan, Appellees, v. KANSAS STATE PARK AND RESOURCES AUTHORITY, Appellant.
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court

1. The common law right of access to a public highway is available to abutting property owners.

2. Abutting is defined as "to touch."

3. In an action to gain access to a park road it is held : Property owners whose land lacks thirty-five feet of touching a park road are not abutting property owners and have no common law right of access.

Robert T. Stephan, Atty. Gen., and Kenneth P. Hackler, Asst. Atty. Gen., were on the brief for appellant.

No appearance by appellees.

Before HERD, Justice Presiding, SWINEHART, J., and LEWIS L. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge Retired, Assigned.

HERD, Justice Presiding:

This is an action for declaratory judgment, injunction and mandamus to compel the Kansas State Park and Resources Authority to provide additional access roads from Woodson Bend Subdivision to the park road in Lake Crawford State Park.

The appellees are residents of Woodson Bend Subdivision in Crawford County. This subdivision shares a common boundary with Lake Crawford State Park. The Kansas Park and Resources Authority has jurisdiction over the park through which runs a park road. Woodson Bend Subdivision contains a sixty foot easement for a road and an eight foot utility easement with a ninety-four foot setback for buildings on each lot. Appellees' property comes within thirty-five feet to seventy-six feet of touching the park road. The Park Authority fenced the park boundary and limited the appellees' ingress to the park road to three accesses. Appellees demand thirteen. The trial court found the park road to be a public road and the appellees as abutting property owners entitled to reasonable access. This appeal followed.

Appellees base their claim to access to the park road on the common law right of access. The Supreme Court outlined this right in Smith v. State Highway Commission, 185 Kan. 445, 451, 346 P.2d 259 (1959):

"It has consistently been held in this jurisdiction the right of access to and from an existing public street or highway is one of the incidents of ownership of land abutting thereon, sometimes called a common law right of access, which may not be taken from the owner by the public without just compensation."

More recently, the Supreme Court stated: "(I)t is recognized in the law of this state that the right of access to and from an existing public street or highway is one of the incidents of ownership of the land abutting thereon." Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n. of America v. City of Wichita, 221 Kan. 325, 330, 559 P.2d 347 (1977). It is apparent this right of access has two components: 1) The persons claiming the right must own land abutting that street or highway; 2) There must be a public street or highway.

Let us examine the first component. Does the property in Woodson Bend Subdivision abut the perimeter road of Lake Crawford State Park? Black's Law Dictionary defines abut as "to reach" or "to touch." (4th ed. 1951 at p. 25) Thus, according to the technical definition, appellees would not be abutting property owners and thereby not entitled to access because their property does not actually border the road.

However, the courts have not been so strict in construing the term. In Riddle v. State Highway Commission, 184 Kan. 603, 610, 339 P.2d 301 (1959), the court stated:

"The right is justified upon the grounds of necessity (citation omitted) and is such as is reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of the land (citation omitted). It is a property right known in law as an 'easement appurtenant' or an 'easement access' to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Chesbro v. Board of County Com'Rs
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 27 Junio 2008
    ... ... OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, Kansas, Appellee ... No. 98,545 ... Court of ... property, the Board was well within its authority to deny Chesbro a residential entrance permit. We ... the County that is a part of Lone Star Lake park. A public park access drive, Douglas County Road ... his statements because Browning failed to state how long he has been employed by the County or ... Spurling v. Kansas State Park & Resources Authority, 6 ... ...
  • Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • 14 Julio 2000
    ... ... by denying him access to his property, the State violates his constitutional rights by depriving ... use of Okemo Mountain Road under the authority granted to it by 10 V.S.A. § 2603. As noted in ... See Spurling v. Kansas State Park & Resources Auth., 6 ... ...
  • Campbell v. Summit Plaza Associates
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 7 Febrero 2008
    ... ... , including Lots 3, 4R, and Tract C of Summit Park Commercial; and (2) the easement terminates at ... Spurling v. Kansas State Park & Res. Auth., 6 Kan.App.2d ... in Colorado, and there is a split of authority in the few jurisdictions that have addressed the ... ...
  • Sebree v. Board of County Com'rs of County of Shawnee
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 30 Octubre 1992
    ... ... Southall; and State of Kansas ... Department of Transportation, ... must be a public street or highway.' Spurling v. Kansas State Park and Resources Authority, 6 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT