Square Const. Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, No. 80-1447

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBefore RUSSELL, WIDENER and PHILLIPS; WIDENER
Citation657 F.2d 68
Parties29 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) 81,782 SQUARE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and La Fera Contracting Company, Appellants, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellee.
Docket NumberNo. 80-1447
Decision Date17 August 1981
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
125 practice notes
  • DeVargas v. Montoya, Nos. 83-2481
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • 8 Julio 1986
    ...of fraudulent conduct, misrepresentation, or other misconduct. Square Construction Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 657 F.2d 68 (4th Cir.1981); Montgomery v. Hall, 592 F.2d 278 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam). The district court found he failed to provide such proof; we fi......
  • Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Co., Nos. 13–1840
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 6 Junio 2014
    ...Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 862 F.2d 910, 924 n. 10 (1st Cir.1988)); see also Square Constr. Co. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 657 F.2d 68, 72 (4th Cir.1981) (“Setting aside a judgment under [Rule] 60(b)(3) does not require that the [fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct] be sufficie......
  • Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Co., Nos. 13–1839
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 25 Noviembre 2014
    ...require a showing of misconduct by the other party, among other things. 12See Square Constr. Co. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 657 F.2d 68, 71 (4th Cir.1981). For the same reasons stated supra, the lower court, familiar with the facts and parties, is better suited to make this determi......
  • Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Co., Nos. 13–1839
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 25 Noviembre 2014
    ...require a showing of misconduct by the other party, among other things. 12 See Square Constr. Co. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 657 F.2d 68, 71 (4th Cir.1981). For the same reasons stated supra, the lower court, familiar with the facts and parties, is better suited to make this determ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
125 cases
  • DeVargas v. Montoya, Nos. 83-2481
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • 8 Julio 1986
    ...of fraudulent conduct, misrepresentation, or other misconduct. Square Construction Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 657 F.2d 68 (4th Cir.1981); Montgomery v. Hall, 592 F.2d 278 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam). The district court found he failed to provide such proof; we fi......
  • Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Co., Nos. 13–1840
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 6 Junio 2014
    ...Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 862 F.2d 910, 924 n. 10 (1st Cir.1988)); see also Square Constr. Co. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 657 F.2d 68, 72 (4th Cir.1981) (“Setting aside a judgment under [Rule] 60(b)(3) does not require that the [fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct] be sufficie......
  • Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Co., Nos. 13–1839
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 25 Noviembre 2014
    ...require a showing of misconduct by the other party, among other things. 12See Square Constr. Co. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 657 F.2d 68, 71 (4th Cir.1981). For the same reasons stated supra, the lower court, familiar with the facts and parties, is better suited to make this determi......
  • Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Co., Nos. 13–1839
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 25 Noviembre 2014
    ...require a showing of misconduct by the other party, among other things. 12 See Square Constr. Co. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 657 F.2d 68, 71 (4th Cir.1981). For the same reasons stated supra, the lower court, familiar with the facts and parties, is better suited to make this determ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT