St. John v. Ridgetree Trails Homeowners Ass'n, ED 104352

• Court: Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM.
• Citation: 519 S.W.3d 464 (Mem)
• Parties: Greg ST. JOHN and Joan St. John, Appellants, v. RIDGETREE TRAILS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Doris Lahay, Brenda Wilson, Don St. Julian, and Dave Jinkerson, Respondents.
• Docket Number: No. ED 104352,ED 104352
• Decision Date: 14 March 2017

519 S.W.3d 464 (Mem)

Greg ST. JOHN and Joan St. John, Appellants,
v.
RIDGETREE TRAILS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Doris Lahay, Brenda Wilson, Don St. Julian, and Dave Jinkerson, Respondents.

No. ED 104352

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: March 14, 2017
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 27, 2017
Application for Transfer Denied June 27, 2017

Ira Michael Berkowitz, Law Office of Ira M. Berkowitz, St. Louis, MO, for Appellants.

Daniel E. Wilke, James Albert Wilke, Co–Counsel, Wilke & Wilke, P.C., St. Louis, MO, Andrew Michael Lammert, Natalie Christine Bohleber, Co–Counsel, McCarthy, Leonard, Kaemmerer, L.C., Town & Country, MO, for Respondents.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Greg St. John and Joan St. John ("Homeowners") appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Ridgetree Trails Homeowners Association, Doris Lahay, Brenda Wilson, Don

519 S.W.3d 465

St. Julian, and Dave Jinkerson (collectively "the Association") on Homeowners' First Amended Petition for breach of contract, negligence and trespass, as well as the trial court's grant of the Association's motion to dismiss Homeowners' nuisance claim. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).