St. Joseph & G.I. Ry. Co. v. United States
Decision Date | 09 March 1916 |
Docket Number | 4523. |
Citation | 232 F. 349 |
Parties | ST. JOSEPH & G.I. RY. CO. v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Where a fireman, after a work train was run onto a siding, was required to keep watch of the engine and keep up steam therein until more than 16 hours after he began work, the Hours of Service Act was violated.
The United States, plaintiff in the court below, instituted a civil action against the defendant, plaintiff in error, to recover penalties for violations of the Hours of Service Act of Congress, approved March 4, 1907. 34 Stat. 1415. There were two counts in the complaint for two violations; but the defendant confessed the first count, which is, therefore eliminated from present consideration.
The second count charged the defendant with having required one J. Kramer, employed as a locomotive fireman by the defendant regularly and generally engaged in and connected with the movement of defendant's trains engaged in interstate commerce, and while so engaged required and permitted him to remain on duty 20 hours; that the train was then used exclusively in the hauling of company material, to wit, ties and cinders, transported from a point without the state of Kansas to a point in the state of Kansas, said ties and cinders to be used in repairing and maintaining the defendant's line of railway between Hiawatha and Seneca in the state of Kansas, which was then and there a through highway of interstate commerce.
The answer admitted the formal allegations of the complaint, and pleaded a general denial of the facts which charge the violation of the statute. A trial by jury was waived, and the cause submitted to the court upon the following agreed statement of facts:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Berry v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
... ... company chat and rocks to be sent to states outside of ... Missouri for the purpose of immediately repairing washouts ... determinations, by the rules enunciated by the United States ... Supreme Court. In C. B. & Q. Railroad v. Harrington, ... In ... St. Joseph & G. I. Railway Co. v. United States, 232 F ... 349, it is said, in ... ...
-
Kepner v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.
... ... 464. (7) Section 1 of Article ... IV of the Constitution of the United States requires that the ... judgment of the Superior Court of Marion ... ...
-
FARMERS'BANK & TRUST CO. v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.
...this train was operating in interstate commerce. United States v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. (D. C.) 157 F. 616; St. Joseph & G. I. Ry. Co. v. United States (C. C. A.) 232 F. 349; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Illinois Central R. R. Co., 215 U. S. 452, 30 S. Ct. 155, 54 L. Ed. 280; North C......
-
Jopek v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, 15241.
...Line R. R., 153 F.2d 243 (C.A.4, 1946); United States v. Baltimore & O. R. R., 133 F.2d 831 (C.A.4, 1943); St. Joseph & G. I. Ry. v. United States, 232 F. 349 (C.A.8, 1916); San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R. R. v. United States, 213 F. 326 (C.A.8, 1914); United States v. Northern Pac. Ry., 224 F.......