St. Louis Car-Coupler Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co.
Decision Date | 08 March 1898 |
Docket Number | 527. |
Citation | 87 F. 885 |
Parties | ST. LOUIS CAR-COUPLER CO. v. NATIONAL MALLEABLE CASTINGS CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
The complainant below and appellant here is engaged in the manufacture and sale of an automatic car coupler, generally known as the 'St. Louis Coupler,' and made under and in accordance with reissued patent No. 10,941, dated June 26 1888. The original patent was No. 369,195, dated August 30 1887. Both the original and reissue were to Madison J Lorraine and Charles T. Aubin. The object of the bill was to restrain an alleged infringement of said reissued patent by the defendant company, which is engaged in the manufacture and sale of a rival car coupler, under a patent to C. A Tower of June 18, 1895, and numbered 541,446. This patent is for an improvement on the patent issued to the same patentee, June 5, 1894, and that was an improvement on the patent issued to the same patentee, October 24, 1893, No. 507,511. Upon a final hearing, before Taft, circuit judge, the bill of complainant was dismissed, upon the ground that the Tower device did not infringe the Lorraine and Aubin patent. The opinion of the circuit court is reported in 81 F. 706. The defenses were noninfringement, invalidity of patent for want of novelty and patentable invention, and that the reissued patent is void for unlawful extensions of the claims of the original patent.
The character of the reissued patent to Lorraine and Aubin is thus stated in the specifications:
For further illustration, we here set out Figs. 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, and 10, shown in the drawings of the patent. The drawings show but one form and arrangement of a vertical plane coupler, and the specifications describe only that form, and do not suggest any modification.
(Image Omitted)
Fig. 1 is a plan of draw-head, with coupling-head-- sometimes called a 'knuckle'-- attached and closed. Fig. 2 is a plan of coupling-head detached from draw-head.
(Image Omitted)
Fig. 3 is a horizontal section, showing lower half of draw-head separate from coupling knuckle. Fig. 5 is a side view of locking pin.
(Image Omitted) Fig. 9 is a side view of two draw-heads, with coupling-heads attached, about to make a coupling, with the left-hand coupling-head closed up and locked, and showing vertical longitudinal section of draw-head through line X9, Y9, of Fig. 10.
(Image Omitted)
Fig. 10 is a horizontal longitudinal section of two opposing draw-heads, with coupling-heads attached, about to make a coupling, with left-hand coupling-head unlocked and open, and the right-hand coupling-head closed and locked. The same letters of reference refer to the same parts throughout.
In Fig. 10, J is the draw-bar; R is the draw-head; B is the buffer; A is the coupling-head, which is pivoted at its center to the draw-head, and which, viewed in position shown in Fig. 2 (which shows the knuckle of Fig. 10), has a general U shape; E is pin that pivots coupling-head to draw-head; A1 is the outer arm or clutch of U-shaped coupling-head; L is rearward arm of U-shaped coupling-head; H is locking pin (said locking pin can be either oblong, round, or square); * * * F is hole in top of draw-head for reception of locking pin (this is not shown in Fig. 10, but is in Fig. 1); F1 is hole which perforates inner arm of coupling-head for purpose of receiving locking pin, and F2 is a hole in bottom of draw-head for purpose of receiving locking pin, and F2 is a hole in bottom of draw-head for same purpose; G is groove in inner arm of coupling-head for guiding locking pin as hole F1 moves from or towards it; S is recess in arm, L, made to receive rib, S1, which is cast to side of draw-head.
The outer or hook arm of the coupling-head is divided so as to receive a link when coupling with common draw-head. The operation of this coupler, as described in the patent, is as follows:
The claims of the patent said to be infringed are the 1st, 2d 3d, 6th, 7th, 8th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 18th, 19th, and 20th, and are as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Durham Duplex Razor Co.
... ... 451, 58 C.C.A. 669; St ... Louis Car-Coupler Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co ... ...
-
Mastoras v. Hildreth
... ... drumlike castings joined together at one side and standing on ... edge. In ... patent from restraining infringement. Bement v. National ... Harrow Co., 186 U.S. 70, 90, 22 Sup.Ct. 747, 46 L.Ed ... [263 F. 576] ... Fed. 405, 16 C.C.A. 293; St. Louis Car-Coupler Co. v ... National Malleable Castings Co., 87 ... ...
-
Gillen v. Reynolds Metals Co.
...v. Lindsay, 113 U.S. 97, 5 S.Ct. 507, 28 L. Ed. 906; Carter Mach. Co. v. Hanes, 4 Cir., 78 F. 346; St. Louis Car Coupler Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co., 6 Cir., 87 F. 885; Overweight Counterbalance Elevator Co. v. Improved Order of Red Men's Hall Ass'n of San Francisco, 9 Cir., 94 F......
-
Powell v. Leicester Mills Co.
... ... v. Superior Drill Co. (C.C.) 56 F. 152; St ... Louis Car-Coupler Co. v. National Malleable Castings ... Co., ... ...