St Paul Co v. United States

Decision Date05 January 1885
Citation28 L.Ed. 861,5 S.Ct. 366,112 U.S. 733
PartiesST. PAUL & D. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

J. F. Farnsworth, for appellant.

Sol. Gen. Phillips, for appellee.

MATTHEWS, J.

On the eighth day of October, 1875, the Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad Company entered into a contract in writing with the United States, acting by the postmaster general, for carrying the mails between St. Paul and Duluth for an agreed compensation of $13,859.97 per annum. On the twentieth day of October, 1876, the postmaster general gave notice to the company of a reduction in its compensation at the rate of $2,772 per annum, in accordance with the post-office appropriation act of July 12, 1876, and on the twenty-eighth day of August, 1878, a further decrease was notified by the department under the post-office appropriation act of June 30, 1878, amounting to $498.96 per annum. The total reduction amounted to $12,141.36, of which $3,686.76 was made prior to June 12, 1877, and $8,454.60 after that date. The service rendered during the first period was by the contractor, the Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad Company, during the latter period, by the appellant, the St. Paul & Duluth Railroad Company, claiming to be the successor to all rights of the former under the contract. Its title thereto arises under a judicial sale by virtue of a decree of the circuit court of the United States for the district of Minnesota, foreclosing a mortgage given by the Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad Company to trustees to secure its bonds, dated January 1, 1869. This mortgage professes to convey the lands of the mortgagor, to which it was or might be entitled under grants from the United States and the state of Minnesota, and its railroad constructed or to be constructed, right of way, and all tracks, bridges, viaducts, culverts, fences, depots, station-houses, and other similar houses, superstructions, erections, and fixtures held or to be acquired for the use of the railway, or in connection therewith, or the business thereof; also, all locomotives, tenders, cars, rolling stock, or equipment, and all machinery, tools, implements, etc., and also all franchises connected with or relating to said railway and said line of telegraph, and all corporate franchises of any nature, including the franchise to be a corporation, and all endowments, income, and advantages, etc., to the above-mentioned lands, railroad, or property belonging or appertaining, and the income, rents, issues, and profits thereof.

The decree for sale directs the sale of the mortgaged premises, and a sale thereof was confirmed by the court and a conveyance made to the appellant, a corporation organized by the purchasers for that purpose, under the laws of Minnesota, on June 27, 1878. In respect to the claim of the appellant for so much of the reduction made by the post-office department as relates to the service performed...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • United States v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co, s. 35
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1949
    ...89, 54 L.Ed. 1065, 20 Ann.Cas. 1116; Nutt v. Knut, 1906, 200 U.S. 12, 26 S.Ct. 216, 50 L.Ed. 348; St. Paul & Duluth R. Co. v. United States, 1885, 112 U.S. 733, 5 S.Ct. 366, 28 L.Ed. 861. The rigor of this rule was very early relaxed in cases which were thought not to be productive of the e......
  • Farmers State Bank of Riverton v. Riverton Const. Co.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • October 16, 1928
    ... ... to the proceeds under the Bridge contract with the United ... States were void. Sec. 3477 R. S. U.S. Manhattan v. Paul, ... (N. Y.) 111 N.E. 478; ... ...
  • Brooks v. Mandel-Witte Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 11, 1932
    ...63 L. Ed. 859; Prairie State Nat. Bank v. United States, 164 U. S. 227, 17 S. Ct. 142, 41 L. Ed. 412; St. Paul & Duluth R. Co. v. United States, 112 U. S. 733, 5 S. Ct. 366, 28 L. Ed. 861; United States v. Gillis, 95 U. S. 407, 24 L. Ed. 503. The purpose of the statute was to protect the go......
  • Porter v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • February 5, 1912
    ... ... UNITED ... STATES GOVERNMENT - CLAIM AGAINST - ASSIGNMENT AND ... TRANSFER-CLAIM AGAINST ... ( Spofford v. Kirk, 97 U.S. 484, 24 L.Ed. 1032; ... St. Paul & Duluth Ry. Co. v. United States, 112 U.S ... 733, 5 S.Ct. 366, 28 L.Ed. 861; Butler v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT