Stadt v. City of Birmingham
| Decision Date | 14 December 1915 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 19 |
| Citation | 70 So. 972,14 Ala.App. 667 |
| Parties | STADT v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; E.C. Crow, Judge.
O.E. Stadt was convicted of violating an ordinance of the City of Birmingham, and appeals. Affirmed.
B.C. Burkhart, of Birmingham, for appellant.
W.A. Jenkins, of Birmingham, for appellee.
The appeal in this case is prosecuted from a judgment of the circuit court of Jefferson county adjudging the defendant guilty of violating a municipal ordinance a quasi criminal prosecution, and no errors are assigned on the record.
The judgment is therefore affirmed, on the authority of Williams v. State, 117 Ala. 199, 23 So. 42; Perry v. State, 1 Ala.App. 253, 55 So. 1035; Dreyfus v. City of Montgomery, 4 Ala.App. 270, 58 So. 730.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Parks v. City of Montgomery
...appealed from must be affirmed. Perry v. State, supra; Dreyfus v. City of Montgomery, 4 Ala.App. 270, 58 So. 730; Stadt v. City of Birmingham, 14 Ala.App. 667, 70 So. 972, 973; Creel v. City of Jasper, Ala.App., 69 So. 239; Craig v. City of Birmingham, supra; Hellner v. City of Montgomery, ......
- Keeble v. State
-
Tharpe v. City of Birmingham
... ... SAMFORD, ... Defendant ... was convicted on a charge of violating a city ordinance, and ... There ... is no assignment of errors, and the judgment is affirmed on ... motion of appellee. Creel v. Jasper (Ala.App.) 69 ... So. 239; Stadt v. Birmingham, 14 Ala. App. 667, 70 ... ...