Stamler v. Willis Cohen v. Willis, 478
Decision Date | 01 October 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 478,No. 479,478,479 |
Citation | 393 U.S. 217,21 L.Ed.2d 356,89 S.Ct. 395 |
Parties | Jeremiah STAMLER et al. v. Edwin E. WILLIS et al. Milton M. COHEN v. Edwin E. WILLIS et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan and Arthur Kinoy, for appellants Jeremiah Stamler and others.
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., for appellant Milton M. Cohen.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney and Lee B. Anderson, for appellees.
Jack G. Day and Melvin L. Wulf, for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amici curiae.
Vern Countryman, Robert F. Drinan, Clark Byse, David F. Cavers, George T. Frampton and Ira M. Heyman, for certain law school deans and professors, as amici curiae.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, and Mr. Justice HARLAN are of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits and that the cases should be set for oral argument.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Com., Dept. of Labor and Industry
... ... spoke in similar vein through Mr. Justice Cohen in Mamula ... v. United Steelworkers, 409 Pa. 175, 185 ... ...
-
Powell v. Cormack
...petition for writ of certiorari, apparently recognizing the validity of the Court of Appeals' ruling. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 217, 89 S.Ct. 395, 21 L.Ed.2d 356 (1968). 4. Petitioners also requested that a writ of mandamus issue ordering that the named officials perform the same acts......
-
Stamler v. Willis, 65 C 800
...Ill., for defendants. Before CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge, and HOFFMAN and NAPOLI, District Judges. Appeal Dismissed November 25, 1968. See 89 S.Ct. 395. MEMORANDUM OF HOFFMAN, District Judge. The plaintiffs, Jeremiah Stamler, M.D., and Yolanda F. Hall, and the intervening plaintiff, Milton M. C......
- Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission