Stamler v. Willis Cohen v. Willis
Decision Date | 20 January 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 479,No. 478,478,479 |
Citation | 393 U.S. 407,89 S.Ct. 677,21 L.Ed.2d 627 |
Parties | Jeremiah STAMLER and Yolanda F. Hall v. Edwin E. WILLIS et al. Milton M. COHEN v. Edwin E. WILLIS et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan and Arthur Kinoy, for appellants Jeremiah Stamler and others.
The petition for a rehearing is denied. The motion to amend the judgment entered on November 25, 1968, dismissing the appeals is granted. The judgment dismissing the appeals is vacated and a new judgment will issue providing that the judgment below be vacated and the cases be remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeals may be taken to the Court of Appeals.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
43 636 Mtm, Inc v. Baxley 8212 1119
...39 L.Ed.2d 505 (1974); Gonzalez v. Employees Credit Union, supra, 419 U.S., at 100, 95 S.Ct., at 295. 8 See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407, 89 S.Ct. 677, 21 L.Ed.2d 627 (1969); Mitchell v. Donovan, 398 U.S. 427, 431, 90 S.Ct. 1763, 1765, 26 L.Ed.2d 378 1. Even on the Court's own terms, Idl......
- Seminole Nation of Oklahoma v. United States
- STAMICARBON, NV v. Escambia Chemical Corporation
-
Stamler v. Willis
...217, 89 S.Ct. 395, 21 L.Ed.2d 356) and then remanded to the (single-judge) district court for the entry of a fresh decree (393 U.S. 407, 89 S.Ct. 677, 21 L.Ed.2d 627).4 Upon remand, the district judge entered another decree resembling the earlier one (reported in 287 F.Supp. 734) but dismis......